File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0151
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-78649884769
- PMID: 20462885
- WOS: WOS:000284104000014
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate-species density relationships
Title | Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate-species density relationships |
---|---|
Authors | Weiser, Michael D.Sanders, Nathan J.Agosti, DonatAndersen, Alan N.Ellison, Aaron M.Fisher, Brian L.Gibb, HeloiseGotelli, Nicholas J.Gove, Aaron D.Gross, KevinGuénard, Benoît S.Janda, MilanKaspari, Michael E.Lessard, Jean PhilippeLongino, John T.Majer, Jonathan D.Menke, Sean B.McGlynn, Terrence P.Parr, Catherine L.Philpott, Stacy M.Retana, Javier RetanaSuarez, Andrew V.Vasconcelos, Heraldo HeraldoYanoviak, Stephen P.Dunn, Robert R. |
Keywords | Global diversity gradients Formicidae Species richness |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Citation | Biology Letters, 2010, v. 6, n. 6, p. 769-772 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Tropical forest canopies house most of the globe's diversity, yet little is known about global patterns and drivers of canopy diversity. Here, we present models of ant species density, using climate, abundance and habitat (i.e. canopy versus litter) as predictors. Ant species density is positively associated with temperature and precipitation, and negatively (or non-significantly) associated with two metrics of seasonality, precipitation seasonality and temperature range. Ant species density was significantly higher in canopy samples, but this difference disappeared once abundance was considered. Thus, apparent differences in species density between canopy and litter samples are probably owing to differences in abundance-diversity relationships, and not differences in climate-diversity relationships. Thus, it appears that canopy and litter ant assemblages share a common abundance-diversity relationship influenced by similar but not identical climatic drivers. © 2010 The Royal Society. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/205742 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.232 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Weiser, Michael D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sanders, Nathan J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Agosti, Donat | - |
dc.contributor.author | Andersen, Alan N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ellison, Aaron M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Fisher, Brian L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gibb, Heloise | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gotelli, Nicholas J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gove, Aaron D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gross, Kevin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Guénard, Benoît S. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Janda, Milan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kaspari, Michael E. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lessard, Jean Philippe | - |
dc.contributor.author | Longino, John T. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Majer, Jonathan D. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Menke, Sean B. | - |
dc.contributor.author | McGlynn, Terrence P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Parr, Catherine L. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Philpott, Stacy M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Retana, Javier Retana | - |
dc.contributor.author | Suarez, Andrew V. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Vasconcelos, Heraldo Heraldo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yanoviak, Stephen P. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dunn, Robert R. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-06T08:02:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-06T08:02:17Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Biology Letters, 2010, v. 6, n. 6, p. 769-772 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1744-9561 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/205742 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Tropical forest canopies house most of the globe's diversity, yet little is known about global patterns and drivers of canopy diversity. Here, we present models of ant species density, using climate, abundance and habitat (i.e. canopy versus litter) as predictors. Ant species density is positively associated with temperature and precipitation, and negatively (or non-significantly) associated with two metrics of seasonality, precipitation seasonality and temperature range. Ant species density was significantly higher in canopy samples, but this difference disappeared once abundance was considered. Thus, apparent differences in species density between canopy and litter samples are probably owing to differences in abundance-diversity relationships, and not differences in climate-diversity relationships. Thus, it appears that canopy and litter ant assemblages share a common abundance-diversity relationship influenced by similar but not identical climatic drivers. © 2010 The Royal Society. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Biology Letters | - |
dc.subject | Global diversity gradients | - |
dc.subject | Formicidae | - |
dc.subject | Species richness | - |
dc.title | Canopy and litter ant assemblages share similar climate-species density relationships | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0151 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20462885 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-78649884769 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 769 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 772 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1744-957X | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000284104000014 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1744-9561 | - |