File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Patient-specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty

TitlePatient-specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherFuture Medicine Ltd
Citation
Patient-specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In Scuderi, GR (Ed.), Current Advances in Total Knee Arthroplasty, p. 56-67. London, England: Future Medicine Ltd, 2014 How to Cite?
AbstractMost orthopedic surgeons use conventional instruments to achieve accurate bone cuts in total knee arthroplasty. An intramedullary alignment rod is usually used to place the cutting jig at a valgus correction angle so that the distal femoral cut is made perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. Over the tibial side, many surgeons use an extramedullary alignment guide to place the cutting jig perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis; some surgeons prefer to use an intramedullary guide. The criticism is that outliers are not uncommon with conventional instruments, even in experienced hands. If the mechanical lower limb alignment within 3° valgus and 3° varus from neutral was considered as normal, 20–33% of total knee arthroplasty would be outside of this range with conventional instruments [1–4]. Factors such as the bowing of the femur and tibia could affect the accuracy of the bone cuts in both the coronal and sagittal planes [5,6].
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205274
ISBN
Series/Report no.Future Science Group eBook collection

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYan, CHen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiu, PKYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-20T02:12:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-20T02:12:06Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationPatient-specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplasty. In Scuderi, GR (Ed.), Current Advances in Total Knee Arthroplasty, p. 56-67. London, England: Future Medicine Ltd, 2014en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781780844985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/205274-
dc.description.abstractMost orthopedic surgeons use conventional instruments to achieve accurate bone cuts in total knee arthroplasty. An intramedullary alignment rod is usually used to place the cutting jig at a valgus correction angle so that the distal femoral cut is made perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the femur. Over the tibial side, many surgeons use an extramedullary alignment guide to place the cutting jig perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis; some surgeons prefer to use an intramedullary guide. The criticism is that outliers are not uncommon with conventional instruments, even in experienced hands. If the mechanical lower limb alignment within 3° valgus and 3° varus from neutral was considered as normal, 20–33% of total knee arthroplasty would be outside of this range with conventional instruments [1–4]. Factors such as the bowing of the femur and tibia could affect the accuracy of the bone cuts in both the coronal and sagittal planes [5,6].-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherFuture Medicine Ltd-
dc.relation.ispartofCurrent Advances in Total Knee Arthroplastyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFuture Science Group eBook collection-
dc.titlePatient-specific Instruments in Total Knee Arthroplastyen_US
dc.typeBook_Chapteren_US
dc.identifier.emailYan, CH: yanchoi@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailChiu, PKY: pkychiu@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityYan, CH=rp00303en_US
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, PKY=rp00379en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2217/fmeb2013.13.196-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84958686256-
dc.identifier.hkuros235825en_US
dc.identifier.spage56en_US
dc.identifier.epage67en_US
dc.publisher.placeLondon, England-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats