File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Comparison of a Low Dose Bisoprolol/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination with Valsartan in the Treatment of Hypertension

TitleComparison of a Low Dose Bisoprolol/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination with Valsartan in the Treatment of Hypertension
Authors
Issue Date2014
Citation
The 10th Asia Pacific Congress of Hypertension (APCH 2014), Cebu, Philippines, 12-15 February 2014 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Beta-blocker thiazide combinations have been criticized because they may have adverse metabolic effects. We compared a low dose bisoprolol (B) hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination (Lodoz) with valsartan on clinic blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP (ABP), heart rate (HR) and metabolic parameters in Chinese patients with mild-moderate hypertension. Methods: Patients on no therapy were randomized to open-label B/HCTZ 2.5/6.25 mg or valsartan 80 mg daily following a placebo run-in. Doses were increased to 5/6.25 mg B/HCTZ or 160 mg valsartan after 4 weeks if target BP was not achieved and treatment continued for 16 weeks. BP, HR and metabolic parameters were evaluated 4 weekly. Results and discussion: After 16 weeks, reductions in clinic BP were similar in 23 patients on B/HCTZ (-22.0±11.3/-11.3±7.1 mmHg) and 21 patients on valsartan (-19.5±13.9/-10.3±9.6 mmHg). All ABP reductions were also similar with the 2 treatments. All HRs were reduced significantly more with B/HCTZ (clinic -8.4±7.8, p<0.001) than valsartan (+2.6±8.3, p=0.29). There were small but significant increases in plasma urea (0.7±1.1 mmol/L) and urate (0.04±0.04 mmol/L) and decrease in HDL cholesterol (0.1±0.2 mmol/L) with B/HCTZ but no significant changes in other lipids, glucose, insulin or HbA1c and none of the metabolic changes with B/HCTZ were significantly different from those with valsartan, which had no significant effects. Both treatments were well tolerated without any drug related adverse events. Conclusions: Low-dose B/HCTZ was as effective in lowering BP as valsartan with minimal metabolic effects. Reduction in resting HR with B/HCTZ may be an advantage in some patients.
DescriptionConference Theme: Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes with Optimal Hypertension Control
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204469

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZeng, WWen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorChu, TTWen_US
dc.contributor.authorTomlinson, Ben_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T23:52:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T23:52:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 10th Asia Pacific Congress of Hypertension (APCH 2014), Cebu, Philippines, 12-15 February 2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/204469-
dc.descriptionConference Theme: Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes with Optimal Hypertension Control-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Beta-blocker thiazide combinations have been criticized because they may have adverse metabolic effects. We compared a low dose bisoprolol (B) hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination (Lodoz) with valsartan on clinic blood pressure (BP), ambulatory BP (ABP), heart rate (HR) and metabolic parameters in Chinese patients with mild-moderate hypertension. Methods: Patients on no therapy were randomized to open-label B/HCTZ 2.5/6.25 mg or valsartan 80 mg daily following a placebo run-in. Doses were increased to 5/6.25 mg B/HCTZ or 160 mg valsartan after 4 weeks if target BP was not achieved and treatment continued for 16 weeks. BP, HR and metabolic parameters were evaluated 4 weekly. Results and discussion: After 16 weeks, reductions in clinic BP were similar in 23 patients on B/HCTZ (-22.0±11.3/-11.3±7.1 mmHg) and 21 patients on valsartan (-19.5±13.9/-10.3±9.6 mmHg). All ABP reductions were also similar with the 2 treatments. All HRs were reduced significantly more with B/HCTZ (clinic -8.4±7.8, p<0.001) than valsartan (+2.6±8.3, p=0.29). There were small but significant increases in plasma urea (0.7±1.1 mmol/L) and urate (0.04±0.04 mmol/L) and decrease in HDL cholesterol (0.1±0.2 mmol/L) with B/HCTZ but no significant changes in other lipids, glucose, insulin or HbA1c and none of the metabolic changes with B/HCTZ were significantly different from those with valsartan, which had no significant effects. Both treatments were well tolerated without any drug related adverse events. Conclusions: Low-dose B/HCTZ was as effective in lowering BP as valsartan with minimal metabolic effects. Reduction in resting HR with B/HCTZ may be an advantage in some patients.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAsia Pacific Congress of Hypertension (APCH)en_US
dc.titleComparison of a Low Dose Bisoprolol/Hydrochlorothiazide Combination with Valsartan in the Treatment of Hypertensionen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailDeng, H: hbdeng1@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.hkuros239967en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats