File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Participatory policy making under authoritarianism: the pathways of local budgetary reform in the People’s Republic of China

TitleParticipatory policy making under authoritarianism: the pathways of local budgetary reform in the People’s Republic of China
Authors
KeywordsAuthoritarianism
Participatory reform
Public budget
Issue Date2016
PublisherThe Policy Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.policypress.co.uk/journals_pap.asp?
Citation
Policy and Politics, 2016, v. 44 n. 2, p. 215-234 How to Cite?
AbstractCitizen participation in policy making is essential in democracies, but there is much less understanding of the process and substance of it in non-democratic states. Taking local budgetary process as an example, this article compares three pathways of participatory reform undertaken by the communist regime in China, namely the representative pathway, the consultative pathway and the transparency pathway. All three are initiated and administered by the local governments, but differ in a number of crucial aspects from the level of institutionalisation to the form of state–citizenry interaction. These three pathways provide directions the Party-state might consider for nationwide policy reform.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203346
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.111
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYan, X-
dc.contributor.authorXIN, G-
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-19T14:13:26Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-19T14:13:26Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationPolicy and Politics, 2016, v. 44 n. 2, p. 215-234-
dc.identifier.issn0305-5736-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/203346-
dc.description.abstractCitizen participation in policy making is essential in democracies, but there is much less understanding of the process and substance of it in non-democratic states. Taking local budgetary process as an example, this article compares three pathways of participatory reform undertaken by the communist regime in China, namely the representative pathway, the consultative pathway and the transparency pathway. All three are initiated and administered by the local governments, but differ in a number of crucial aspects from the level of institutionalisation to the form of state–citizenry interaction. These three pathways provide directions the Party-state might consider for nationwide policy reform.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherThe Policy Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.policypress.co.uk/journals_pap.asp?-
dc.relation.ispartofPolicy and Politics-
dc.rightsPolicy and Politics. Copyright © The Policy Press.-
dc.rightsThis is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of an article published in [insert name of relevant Policy Press journal here]. The definitive publisher-authenticated version [insert complete citation information here] is available online at: [insert URL here]-
dc.subjectAuthoritarianism-
dc.subjectParticipatory reform-
dc.subjectPublic budget-
dc.titleParticipatory policy making under authoritarianism: the pathways of local budgetary reform in the People’s Republic of China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailYan, X: xyan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityYan, X=rp00644-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1332/147084414X14024918243748-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85027313193-
dc.identifier.hkuros235845-
dc.identifier.volume44-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage215-
dc.identifier.epage234-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000375272800004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0305-5736-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats