File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Measuring judicial deference in Constitutional Rights adjudication

TitleMeasuring judicial deference in Constitutional Rights adjudication
Authors
Chan, CSW
Issue Date2014
Citation
The 9th Administrative Law Discussion Forum, the Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 10-11 June 2014. How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper proposes a quantitative model for measuring the degree of judicial deference in constitutional rights adjudication in Hong Kong. The model is likely to be transferable (at least partially) to jurisdictions which, like Hong Kong, embrace proportionality as a standard of review for assessing limitations to rights.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199542

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, CSWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-22T01:22:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-22T01:22:15Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 9th Administrative Law Discussion Forum, the Institutum Iurisprudentiae, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 10-11 June 2014.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/199542-
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a quantitative model for measuring the degree of judicial deference in constitutional rights adjudication in Hong Kong. The model is likely to be transferable (at least partially) to jurisdictions which, like Hong Kong, embrace proportionality as a standard of review for assessing limitations to rights.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAdministrative Law Discussion Forum 2014en_US
dc.titleMeasuring judicial deference in Constitutional Rights adjudicationen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailChan, CSW: corachan@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CSW=rp01296en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros231214en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats