File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Book Chapter: Traditional and Modern MCQ Methods as In-class Formative Assessment

TitleTraditional and Modern MCQ Methods as In-class Formative Assessment
Authors
Chan, CKYTam, VWLFok, WWT
Issue Date2013
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Traditional and Modern MCQ Methods as In-class Formative Assessment. In Sobh, TM & Elleithy, K (Eds.), Emerging Trends in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, and Engineering, p. 1061-1066. New York: Springer, 2013 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3558-7_90
AbstractThis study was designed to compare three different Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) delivery methods namely clickers, pen and paper MCQs and online elearning MCQs on the effectiveness of student engagement used as an in-class formative assessment. The results were also compared without the use of any formative assessment. Overall, the majority of students appreciates and recommends in-class formative assessment particularly clickers and online elearning to be used in other courses. In the presentation, the results of these assessment delivery methods will be discussed as well as issues and concerns found by the observer using these delivery methods.
DescriptionThis book includes the proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Computer, Information, and Systems Sciences, and Engineering (CISSE 2010)
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/197807
ISBN
9781461435570
ISSN
1876-1100
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.134
Series/Report no.Lecture notes in electrical engineering; v. 151

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, CKYen_US
dc.contributor.authorTam, VWLen_US
dc.contributor.authorFok, WWTen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-29T08:57:19Z-
dc.date.available2014-05-29T08:57:19Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.citationTraditional and Modern MCQ Methods as In-class Formative Assessment. In Sobh, TM & Elleithy, K (Eds.), Emerging Trends in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, and Engineering, p. 1061-1066. New York: Springer, 2013en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781461435570en_US
dc.identifier.issn1876-1100-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/197807-
dc.descriptionThis book includes the proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Computer, Information, and Systems Sciences, and Engineering (CISSE 2010)-
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to compare three different Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) delivery methods namely clickers, pen and paper MCQs and online elearning MCQs on the effectiveness of student engagement used as an in-class formative assessment. The results were also compared without the use of any formative assessment. Overall, the majority of students appreciates and recommends in-class formative assessment particularly clickers and online elearning to be used in other courses. In the presentation, the results of these assessment delivery methods will be discussed as well as issues and concerns found by the observer using these delivery methods.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofEmerging Trends in Computing, Informatics, Systems Sciences, and Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLecture notes in electrical engineering; v. 151-
dc.titleTraditional and Modern MCQ Methods as In-class Formative Assessmenten_US
dc.typeBook_Chapteren_US
dc.identifier.emailChan, CKY: cecilia.chan@caut.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailTam, VWL: vtam@eee.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailFok, WWT: wilton@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CKY=rp00892en_US
dc.identifier.authorityTam, VWL=rp00173en_US
dc.identifier.authorityFok, WWT=rp00116en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-4614-3558-7_90en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84865974657-
dc.identifier.hkuros228900en_US
dc.identifier.volume151en_US
dc.identifier.spage1061en_US
dc.identifier.epage1066en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1876-1119-
dc.publisher.placeNew Yorken_US
dc.identifier.issnl1876-1100-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats