File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: A study of operator and parameter choices in non-revisiting genetic algorithm

TitleA study of operator and parameter choices in non-revisiting genetic algorithm
Authors
Issue Date2009
PublisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4235
Citation
The 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2009), Trondheim, Norway, 18-21 May 2009. In IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2009, p. 2977-2984 How to Cite?
AbstractWe study empirically the effects of operator and parameter choices on the performance of the non-revisiting genetic algorithm (NrGA). For a suite of 14 benchmark functions that include both uni-modal and multi-modal functions, it is found that NrGA is insensitive to the axis resolution of the problem, which is a good feature. From the empirical experiments, for operators, it is found that crossover is an essential operator for NrGA, and the best crossover operator is uniform crossover, while the best selection operator is elitist selection. For parameters, a small population, with a population size strictly larger than 1, should be used; the performance is monotonically increasing with crossover rate and the optimal crossover rate is 0.5. The results of this paper provide empirical guidelines for operator designs and parameter settings of NrGA. © 2009 IEEE.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/196711
ISBN
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 5.209
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYuen, SY-
dc.contributor.authorChow, CK-
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-24T02:10:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-04-24T02:10:35Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationThe 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2009), Trondheim, Norway, 18-21 May 2009. In IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 2009, p. 2977-2984-
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-4244-2958-5-
dc.identifier.issn1089-778X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/196711-
dc.description.abstractWe study empirically the effects of operator and parameter choices on the performance of the non-revisiting genetic algorithm (NrGA). For a suite of 14 benchmark functions that include both uni-modal and multi-modal functions, it is found that NrGA is insensitive to the axis resolution of the problem, which is a good feature. From the empirical experiments, for operators, it is found that crossover is an essential operator for NrGA, and the best crossover operator is uniform crossover, while the best selection operator is elitist selection. For parameters, a small population, with a population size strictly larger than 1, should be used; the performance is monotonically increasing with crossover rate and the optimal crossover rate is 0.5. The results of this paper provide empirical guidelines for operator designs and parameter settings of NrGA. © 2009 IEEE.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4235-
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation-
dc.rights©2009 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.-
dc.titleA study of operator and parameter choices in non-revisiting genetic algorithm-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/CEC.2009.4983318-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-70450080718-
dc.identifier.spage2977-
dc.identifier.epage2984-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000274803101131-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.customcontrol.immutablesml 160602 amended-
dc.identifier.issnl1089-778X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats