File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Evaluation of sexual function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RaLRP) in sexually active patients

TitleEvaluation of sexual function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RaLRP) in sexually active patients
Authors
Issue Date2014
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/
Citation
Hong Kong Urological Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 10 November 2013. In BJU International, 2014, v. 113 n. Suppl. S1, p. 7-8 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To evaluate the erectile dysfunction (ED) after RaLRP using the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) with respective to the effects of age, nerve preservation and its technique. Patients & Methods: From July 2009 to Aug 2012, among 144 RaLRP in the two hospitals, patients sexually active during pre-operative counseling and had nerve preservation (unilateral/bilateral) were included. Post-surgery erectile function was assessed with IIEF-5 at 3, 9 and 18 months post-operatively. The results were compared between different age groups and with respect to the nerve-sparing (NS) technique adopted. Results: A total of 39 patients with nerve preservation got IIEF-5 recorded. The men age was 64.4 ± 5.91. The mean pre-operative IIEF-5 score was 17.23 ± 6.38, with significant drop after operation and gradual recovery, ie. scores being 7.05 ± 7.97, 9.33 ± 8.49 and 11.55 ± 9.40 at 3, 9 and 18 months follow up, respectively. Patients with higher pre-operative IIEF score and age below 70 had better recovery of potency, although statistical significance was not reached. Bilateral nerve preservation was associated with better potency recovery when compared to unilateral nerve preservation (3 m: −9.15 vs −12.5, p = 0.253, 9 m: −5.26 vs −13.83, p = 0.009, 18 m: −2.06 vs −12.00, p = 0.031), as was the use of intrafascial dissection technique compared to interfascial dissection (3 m: −9.72 vs −11.50, p = 0.055, 9 m: −6.69 vs −11.40, p = 0.126, 18 m: −1.87 vs −11.00, p = 0.019). Conclusion: Nerve preservation and its technique are factors predicting the post-operative recovery of erectile function in patients undergoing RaLRP, while the effects of age and pre-operative IIEF score do not reach statistical significance in our study.
DescriptionOral Presentation
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/193961
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.337

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMa, WKen_US
dc.contributor.authorNg, CMen_US
dc.contributor.authorIp, CHen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsang, CFen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheung, FKen_US
dc.contributor.authorYiu, MKen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-28T06:38:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-01-28T06:38:22Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationHong Kong Urological Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Hong Kong, 10 November 2013. In BJU International, 2014, v. 113 n. Suppl. S1, p. 7-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/193961-
dc.descriptionOral Presentation-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the erectile dysfunction (ED) after RaLRP using the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) with respective to the effects of age, nerve preservation and its technique. Patients & Methods: From July 2009 to Aug 2012, among 144 RaLRP in the two hospitals, patients sexually active during pre-operative counseling and had nerve preservation (unilateral/bilateral) were included. Post-surgery erectile function was assessed with IIEF-5 at 3, 9 and 18 months post-operatively. The results were compared between different age groups and with respect to the nerve-sparing (NS) technique adopted. Results: A total of 39 patients with nerve preservation got IIEF-5 recorded. The men age was 64.4 ± 5.91. The mean pre-operative IIEF-5 score was 17.23 ± 6.38, with significant drop after operation and gradual recovery, ie. scores being 7.05 ± 7.97, 9.33 ± 8.49 and 11.55 ± 9.40 at 3, 9 and 18 months follow up, respectively. Patients with higher pre-operative IIEF score and age below 70 had better recovery of potency, although statistical significance was not reached. Bilateral nerve preservation was associated with better potency recovery when compared to unilateral nerve preservation (3 m: −9.15 vs −12.5, p = 0.253, 9 m: −5.26 vs −13.83, p = 0.009, 18 m: −2.06 vs −12.00, p = 0.031), as was the use of intrafascial dissection technique compared to interfascial dissection (3 m: −9.72 vs −11.50, p = 0.055, 9 m: −6.69 vs −11.40, p = 0.126, 18 m: −1.87 vs −11.00, p = 0.019). Conclusion: Nerve preservation and its technique are factors predicting the post-operative recovery of erectile function in patients undergoing RaLRP, while the effects of age and pre-operative IIEF score do not reach statistical significance in our study.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.bjui.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofBJU Internationalen_US
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com-
dc.titleEvaluation of sexual function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RaLRP) in sexually active patientsen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailYiu, MK: pmkyiu@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.12606-
dc.identifier.hkuros227501en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros228430-
dc.identifier.volume113-
dc.identifier.issueSuppl. S1-
dc.identifier.spage7-
dc.identifier.epage8-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl1464-4096-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats