File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.04.016
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79956215003
- WOS: WOS:000293807800001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Universal service subsidies and cost overstatement: Evidence from the U.S. telecommunications sector
Title | Universal service subsidies and cost overstatement: Evidence from the U.S. telecommunications sector |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Telecommunications High cost subsidies Universal service |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Publisher | Elsevier. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03085961 |
Citation | Telecommunications Policy, 2011, v. 35 n. 7, p. 583-591 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Utility subsidies are often defended as promoting universal service. However, specific support formulas may be poorly targeted and/or designed. The U.S. high-cost loop support (HCLS) program (formerly referred to as the Universal Service Fund (USF)), has been a key component of the FCC's USF program. With proposed initiatives for universal access to broadband, it is useful to critically evaluate how the HCLS creates a moral hazard problem. This study finds that companies receiving HCLS subsidies have an incentive to report high costs to the FCC in order to qualify for still higher support payments. Using data from 1136 rural telecom firms in 50 states (1992–2002), this study shows that some companies respond to current incentives by overstating costs (or incurring higher costs) as they approach the subsidy cutoff points. Compared to the no-subsidy group, companies at the point of greatest subsidy jump appear to overstate costs more due to larger marginal benefits. Such perverse incentives need to be recognized in future universal service initiatives. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/192337 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.647 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Berg, SV | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jiang, L | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lin, C | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-24T01:50:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-24T01:50:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Telecommunications Policy, 2011, v. 35 n. 7, p. 583-591 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0308-5961 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/192337 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Utility subsidies are often defended as promoting universal service. However, specific support formulas may be poorly targeted and/or designed. The U.S. high-cost loop support (HCLS) program (formerly referred to as the Universal Service Fund (USF)), has been a key component of the FCC's USF program. With proposed initiatives for universal access to broadband, it is useful to critically evaluate how the HCLS creates a moral hazard problem. This study finds that companies receiving HCLS subsidies have an incentive to report high costs to the FCC in order to qualify for still higher support payments. Using data from 1136 rural telecom firms in 50 states (1992–2002), this study shows that some companies respond to current incentives by overstating costs (or incurring higher costs) as they approach the subsidy cutoff points. Compared to the no-subsidy group, companies at the point of greatest subsidy jump appear to overstate costs more due to larger marginal benefits. Such perverse incentives need to be recognized in future universal service initiatives. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03085961 | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Telecommunications Policy | en_US |
dc.subject | Telecommunications | - |
dc.subject | High cost subsidies | - |
dc.subject | Universal service | - |
dc.title | Universal service subsidies and cost overstatement: Evidence from the U.S. telecommunications sector | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.04.016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79956215003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 583 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 591 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000293807800001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0308-5961 | - |