File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Zhuangzi, perspectives, and greater knowledge

TitleZhuangzi, perspectives, and greater knowledge
Authors
Issue Date2012
PublisherThe Australasian Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy (ASACP).
Citation
The Australasian Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy (ASACP) Conference, Sydney, Australia, 9-11 July 2012 , p. 14 How to Cite?
AbstractAlthough the text of the Zhuangzi appears to present prima facie skeptical arguments, there has been much debate as to the nature of its skeptical stance, and even whether or not its stance is substantively skeptical at all. In this paper I attempt to engage with both the skeptical aspects of the text and its positive agenda, by firstly accepting that the Zhuangzi takes a substantive skeptical stance, but also arguing that in doing so the text provides a positive account of how to improve our epistemic position – an account which might be a motivating factor of the Zhuangist ethical stance. My argument will focus on Zhuangist attitudes to different types of knowledge, specifically what the text refers to as “lesser knowledge (小知 xiao zhi)” and “greater knowledge (大知 da zhi)”, and the relationship between the two. I will attempt to show that, far from promoting “epistemological nihilism” as has been claimed by some, the Zhuangist stance is actually that of a “positive skeptic” who can offer wide-ranging practical advice on how to improve our own epistemic situation, while at the same time warning us of the ultimate limits of what we can come to know.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/192043

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSturgeon, DJen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-15T07:48:37Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-15T07:48:37Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Australasian Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy (ASACP) Conference, Sydney, Australia, 9-11 July 2012 , p. 14en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/192043-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the text of the Zhuangzi appears to present prima facie skeptical arguments, there has been much debate as to the nature of its skeptical stance, and even whether or not its stance is substantively skeptical at all. In this paper I attempt to engage with both the skeptical aspects of the text and its positive agenda, by firstly accepting that the Zhuangzi takes a substantive skeptical stance, but also arguing that in doing so the text provides a positive account of how to improve our epistemic position – an account which might be a motivating factor of the Zhuangist ethical stance. My argument will focus on Zhuangist attitudes to different types of knowledge, specifically what the text refers to as “lesser knowledge (小知 xiao zhi)” and “greater knowledge (大知 da zhi)”, and the relationship between the two. I will attempt to show that, far from promoting “epistemological nihilism” as has been claimed by some, the Zhuangist stance is actually that of a “positive skeptic” who can offer wide-ranging practical advice on how to improve our own epistemic situation, while at the same time warning us of the ultimate limits of what we can come to know.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherThe Australasian Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy (ASACP).-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Australasian Society for Asian and Comparative Philosophy (ASACP) Conferenceen_US
dc.titleZhuangzi, perspectives, and greater knowledgeen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.hkuros225779en_US
dc.identifier.spage14-
dc.identifier.epage14-
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats