File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Three Puzzles about Conforming Upwards
Title | Three Puzzles about Conforming Upwards |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2013 |
Citation | The 2013 Joint Meeting of the Society for Asian & Comparative Philosophy (SACP) and Australasian Society for Asian & Comparative Philosophy (ASAC), Singapore, 8-11 July 2013. In Abstracts Book, 2013, p. 18 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The Mohists‘ defense of their doctrine of conforming upwards appeals to a sort of state of nature. They claim
that the widespread conflict and disorder in this state of nature led people to choose the most worthy among
them to rule them as emperor. What is most striking about this argument is that it appeals not to conflicts
between people‘s interests but to moral disagreement: in the Mohists‘ state of nature, everyone disagreed
morally with everyone, and this is what led to conflict and disorder. This argument raises three difficult puzzles:
1. How could moral disagreement cause as much conflict and disorder as it is supposed to in the Mohists‘
state of nature?
2. How could people who disagreed so extensively about what is right nonetheless agree about who is
most worthy to be selected as emperor?
3. What guarantees that the person chosen as most worthy would hold specifically Mohist views about
what is right (as clearly the Mohists assume he would)?
This paper defends a solution to these puzzles that turns on the idea that we tend to moralise our desires so that
conflicts between our desires tend to manifest in moral disagreements. (For example, if you take something that
I want, that might be enough for me to judge that you have done something morally wrong.) It will follow that
when the emperor unifies the world‘s moral norms, he is in a way also in a way harmonising their desires. I
conclude that the resulting harmony is most fully expressed in the Mohists‘ doctrine of inclusive care. |
Description | Panel VA: Conflicts of Obedience |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/192027 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Robins, DP | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-10-15T07:48:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-10-15T07:48:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The 2013 Joint Meeting of the Society for Asian & Comparative Philosophy (SACP) and Australasian Society for Asian & Comparative Philosophy (ASAC), Singapore, 8-11 July 2013. In Abstracts Book, 2013, p. 18 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/192027 | - |
dc.description | Panel VA: Conflicts of Obedience | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Mohists‘ defense of their doctrine of conforming upwards appeals to a sort of state of nature. They claim that the widespread conflict and disorder in this state of nature led people to choose the most worthy among them to rule them as emperor. What is most striking about this argument is that it appeals not to conflicts between people‘s interests but to moral disagreement: in the Mohists‘ state of nature, everyone disagreed morally with everyone, and this is what led to conflict and disorder. This argument raises three difficult puzzles: 1. How could moral disagreement cause as much conflict and disorder as it is supposed to in the Mohists‘ state of nature? 2. How could people who disagreed so extensively about what is right nonetheless agree about who is most worthy to be selected as emperor? 3. What guarantees that the person chosen as most worthy would hold specifically Mohist views about what is right (as clearly the Mohists assume he would)? This paper defends a solution to these puzzles that turns on the idea that we tend to moralise our desires so that conflicts between our desires tend to manifest in moral disagreements. (For example, if you take something that I want, that might be enough for me to judge that you have done something morally wrong.) It will follow that when the emperor unifies the world‘s moral norms, he is in a way also in a way harmonising their desires. I conclude that the resulting harmony is most fully expressed in the Mohists‘ doctrine of inclusive care. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | SACP and ASAC Joint Meeting | en_US |
dc.title | Three Puzzles about Conforming Upwards | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Robins, DP: robins@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Robins, DP=rp01642 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 225313 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 18 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 18 | - |