File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/uog.6255
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-61849156921
- PMID: 19248036
- WOS: WOS:000266505500006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of inter- and intraobserver agreement between three types of fetal volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL™, VOCAL™ and multiplanar)
Title | Comparison of inter- and intraobserver agreement between three types of fetal volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL™, VOCAL™ and multiplanar) |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | 3D ultrasound Fetal volume Multiplanar VOCAL XI VOCAL |
Issue Date | 2009 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0960-7692/ |
Citation | Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology, 2009, v. 33 n. 3, p. 287-294 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives To compare the new XI VOCAL™ (eXtended Imaging Virtual Organ Computer-aided Analysis) for three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound measurement of fetal volume with the conventional multiplanar technique and a rotational method using VOCAL™. Methods We acquired 3D volume datasets from 30 fetuses at 11-14 weeks of gestation using a commercially available ultrasound system. Fetal volume was calculated using XI VOCAL (with 5, 10, 15 and 20 slices), multiplanar (1-mm interval) and VOCAL (with 12°,18° and 30° rotation) techniques. The level of agreement for interobserver and intraobserver variability was determined and evaluated for all methods and reliability was assessed. Results Fetal volume measurements obtained using XI VOCAL (10 slices) showed good correlation with those obtained using VOCAL (18°)(r = 0.940, P = 0.076; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 0.962 (95% CI, 0.920-0.982), P = 0.182), and XI VOCAL (15 slices) showed good correlation with VOCAL (12°)(r = 0.961, P = 0.092; ICC, 0.979 (95% CI, 0.957-0.990), P = 0.190). The mean difference between paired measurements by the XI VOCAL (10 slices) and VOCAL (18°) methods was 1.00 mL, while that by the XI VOCAL (15 slices) and VOCAL (12°) methods was 0.90 mL. 95% limits of agreement were -2.80 to 4.80 between XI VOCAL (10 slices) and VOCAL (18°)and-1.90 to 3.70 between XI VOCAL (15 slices) and VOCAL (12°). There was a small difference in the time required to complete the fetal volume measurement between XI VOCAL and VOCAL when a similar number of slices or rotational steps was used (P < 0.05), XI VOCAL taking less time. Conclusion XI VOCAL (with 10, 15 and 20 slices) can be used interchangeably with the multiplanar technique (1-mm interval) for the measurement of fetal volume. XI VOCAL (10 slices) and VOCAL (18°) can be used interchangeably, as can XI VOCAL (15 slices) and VOCAL (12°), for the measurement of fetal volume. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/180694 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.207 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Cheong, KB | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Leung, KY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, HY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, YP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, F | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, MHY | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-28T01:41:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-01-28T01:41:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology, 2009, v. 33 n. 3, p. 287-294 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-7692 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/180694 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives To compare the new XI VOCAL™ (eXtended Imaging Virtual Organ Computer-aided Analysis) for three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound measurement of fetal volume with the conventional multiplanar technique and a rotational method using VOCAL™. Methods We acquired 3D volume datasets from 30 fetuses at 11-14 weeks of gestation using a commercially available ultrasound system. Fetal volume was calculated using XI VOCAL (with 5, 10, 15 and 20 slices), multiplanar (1-mm interval) and VOCAL (with 12°,18° and 30° rotation) techniques. The level of agreement for interobserver and intraobserver variability was determined and evaluated for all methods and reliability was assessed. Results Fetal volume measurements obtained using XI VOCAL (10 slices) showed good correlation with those obtained using VOCAL (18°)(r = 0.940, P = 0.076; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), 0.962 (95% CI, 0.920-0.982), P = 0.182), and XI VOCAL (15 slices) showed good correlation with VOCAL (12°)(r = 0.961, P = 0.092; ICC, 0.979 (95% CI, 0.957-0.990), P = 0.190). The mean difference between paired measurements by the XI VOCAL (10 slices) and VOCAL (18°) methods was 1.00 mL, while that by the XI VOCAL (15 slices) and VOCAL (12°) methods was 0.90 mL. 95% limits of agreement were -2.80 to 4.80 between XI VOCAL (10 slices) and VOCAL (18°)and-1.90 to 3.70 between XI VOCAL (15 slices) and VOCAL (12°). There was a small difference in the time required to complete the fetal volume measurement between XI VOCAL and VOCAL when a similar number of slices or rotational steps was used (P < 0.05), XI VOCAL taking less time. Conclusion XI VOCAL (with 10, 15 and 20 slices) can be used interchangeably with the multiplanar technique (1-mm interval) for the measurement of fetal volume. XI VOCAL (10 slices) and VOCAL (18°) can be used interchangeably, as can XI VOCAL (15 slices) and VOCAL (12°), for the measurement of fetal volume. Copyright © 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0960-7692/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology | en_US |
dc.subject | 3D ultrasound | - |
dc.subject | Fetal volume | - |
dc.subject | Multiplanar | - |
dc.subject | VOCAL | - |
dc.subject | XI VOCAL | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Fetal Development - Physiology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Fetal Diseases - Ultrasonography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Gestational Age | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - Instrumentation - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Imaging, Three-Dimensional - Instrumentation - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Observer Variation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Prognosis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ultrasonography, Prenatal - Instrumentation - Methods | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of inter- and intraobserver agreement between three types of fetal volume measurement technique (XI VOCAL™, VOCAL™ and multiplanar) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tang, MHY: mhytang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Tang, MHY=rp01701 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/uog.6255 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19248036 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-61849156921 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-61849156921&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 287 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 294 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000266505500006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheong, KB=26321364700 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, KY=8247106900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, HY=7403402562 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, YP=15033545100 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yang, F=35363141900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, MHY=35362943900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0960-7692 | - |