File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/uog.5232
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-54549113274
- PMID: 18254132
- WOS: WOS:000253511300004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: A randomized controlled trial
Title | Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: A randomized controlled trial |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Early pregnancy Fetal structural abnormalities Nuchal scan Prenatal diagnosis Randomization Ultrasound |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0960-7692/ |
Citation | Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology, 2008, v. 31 n. 2, p. 136-146 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a nuchal scan at 10 to 14 + 6 weeks and a detailed morphology scan at 12 to 14 + 6 weeks in screening for fetal structural abnormalities. Methods: From March 2001 to November 2004, 8811 pregnant women were randomized into either the control group (10 to 14 + 6-week nuchal scan followed by routine 16-23-week scan) or the study group (10 to 14 + 6-week nuchal scan and 12 to 14 + 6-week detailed scan followed by routine 16-23-week scan). Results: We analyzed 7642 cases of singleton pregnancies with viable fetuses at first-trimester ultrasound examination and with known pregnancy outcome. In the control group, the detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester was 32.8% (21/64; 95% CI, 21.6-45.7%) and the overall detection rate was 64.1% (41/64; 95% CI, 51.1-75.7%). In the study group, the detection rate in the first trimester was 47.6% (30/63; 95% CI, 34.9-60.6) and the overall detection rate was 66.7% (42/63; 95% CI, 53.7-78.0%). The overall detection rate in the control group did not differ significantly from that in the study group (P >0.05). Conclusions: When the nuchal scan is offered, a basic anatomical survey can be done in conjunction with nuchal translucency thickness measurement. A detailed ultrasound examination at this early gestational age may not be superior to the nuchal scan in screening for fetal abnormalities in the low-risk population. Though a wide range of abnormalities can be detected at 10 to 14 + 6 weeks, the routine 16-23-week scan cannot be abandoned. Copyright © 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/180691 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.207 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, CP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, YH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, RYK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, BCP | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, SF | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tse, LHY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, MHY | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-01-28T01:41:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-01-28T01:41:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ultrasound In Obstetrics And Gynecology, 2008, v. 31 n. 2, p. 136-146 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0960-7692 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/180691 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a nuchal scan at 10 to 14 + 6 weeks and a detailed morphology scan at 12 to 14 + 6 weeks in screening for fetal structural abnormalities. Methods: From March 2001 to November 2004, 8811 pregnant women were randomized into either the control group (10 to 14 + 6-week nuchal scan followed by routine 16-23-week scan) or the study group (10 to 14 + 6-week nuchal scan and 12 to 14 + 6-week detailed scan followed by routine 16-23-week scan). Results: We analyzed 7642 cases of singleton pregnancies with viable fetuses at first-trimester ultrasound examination and with known pregnancy outcome. In the control group, the detection rate of structural abnormalities in the first trimester was 32.8% (21/64; 95% CI, 21.6-45.7%) and the overall detection rate was 64.1% (41/64; 95% CI, 51.1-75.7%). In the study group, the detection rate in the first trimester was 47.6% (30/63; 95% CI, 34.9-60.6) and the overall detection rate was 66.7% (42/63; 95% CI, 53.7-78.0%). The overall detection rate in the control group did not differ significantly from that in the study group (P >0.05). Conclusions: When the nuchal scan is offered, a basic anatomical survey can be done in conjunction with nuchal translucency thickness measurement. A detailed ultrasound examination at this early gestational age may not be superior to the nuchal scan in screening for fetal abnormalities in the low-risk population. Though a wide range of abnormalities can be detected at 10 to 14 + 6 weeks, the routine 16-23-week scan cannot be abandoned. Copyright © 2008 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.interscience.wiley.com/jpages/0960-7692/ | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology | en_US |
dc.subject | Early pregnancy | - |
dc.subject | Fetal structural abnormalities | - |
dc.subject | Nuchal scan | - |
dc.subject | Prenatal diagnosis | - |
dc.subject | Randomization | - |
dc.subject | Ultrasound | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Down Syndrome - Ultrasonography | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Fetus - Abnormalities | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nuchal Translucency Measurement | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Pregnancy Trimester, First | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ultrasonography, Prenatal | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of nuchal and detailed morphology ultrasound examinations in early pregnancy for fetal structural abnormality screening: A randomized controlled trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Tang, MHY: mhytang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Tang, MHY=rp01701 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/uog.5232 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18254132 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-54549113274 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 164969 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-54549113274&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 136 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 146 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000253511300004 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chen, M=26028797000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, CP=7410149538 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, YH=7202563903 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, RYK=7202300287 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, BCP=7201530637 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, SF=7404590679 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tse, LHY=36891045800 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, MHY=35362943900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0960-7692 | - |