File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Reliability and validity of the IPAQ-L in a sample of Hong Kong Urban older adults: Does neighborhood of residence matter?

TitleReliability and validity of the IPAQ-L in a sample of Hong Kong Urban older adults: Does neighborhood of residence matter?
Authors
KeywordsElders
Physical Activity
Self-Report Measure
Walkability
Issue Date2012
PublisherHuman Kinetics. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.humankinetics.com/japa
Citation
Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 2012, v. 20 n. 4, p. 402-420 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study examined reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form (IPAQ-LC) in Chinese seniors, including moderating effects of neighborhood walkability and socioeconomic status (SES) on reliability and validity. The IPAQ-LC was interviewer-administered (n = 96), accelerometer and 7-day walk-diary data were collected (n = 94), and the IPAC-LC was readministered (N = 92). Acceptable reliability was found for all measures of physical activity (PA) overall and across different types of neighborhood. Participants from highly walkable neighborhoods were more reliable at estimating walking for transport. Participants from low-SES areas were less reliable at estimating leisure-time PA and sitting but more reliable at estimating transport-related walking. IPAQ-LC walking was significantly related to light-but not moderate-intensity accelerometry-based PA. It was moderately to strongly related to a 7-day diary of walking. The data imply slow-paced walking, probably due to age, climate, and terrain. The findings suggest that the IPAQ-LC's reliability and validity are acceptable in Chinese seniors. © 2012 Human Kinetics, Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/176082
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.509
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCerin, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheung, MCen_US
dc.contributor.authorSit, CHPen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacfarlane, DJen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, WMen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-26T09:04:55Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-26T09:04:55Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Aging and Physical Activity, 2012, v. 20 n. 4, p. 402-420en_US
dc.identifier.issn1063-8652en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/176082-
dc.description.abstractThis study examined reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Long Form (IPAQ-LC) in Chinese seniors, including moderating effects of neighborhood walkability and socioeconomic status (SES) on reliability and validity. The IPAQ-LC was interviewer-administered (n = 96), accelerometer and 7-day walk-diary data were collected (n = 94), and the IPAC-LC was readministered (N = 92). Acceptable reliability was found for all measures of physical activity (PA) overall and across different types of neighborhood. Participants from highly walkable neighborhoods were more reliable at estimating walking for transport. Participants from low-SES areas were less reliable at estimating leisure-time PA and sitting but more reliable at estimating transport-related walking. IPAQ-LC walking was significantly related to light-but not moderate-intensity accelerometry-based PA. It was moderately to strongly related to a 7-day diary of walking. The data imply slow-paced walking, probably due to age, climate, and terrain. The findings suggest that the IPAQ-LC's reliability and validity are acceptable in Chinese seniors. © 2012 Human Kinetics, Inc.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherHuman Kinetics. The Journal's web site is located at http://journals.humankinetics.com/japa-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Aging and Physical Activityen_US
dc.subjectEldersen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Activityen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Report Measureen_US
dc.subjectWalkabilityen_US
dc.titleReliability and validity of the IPAQ-L in a sample of Hong Kong Urban older adults: Does neighborhood of residence matter?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailCerin, E: ecerin@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailMacfarlane, DJ: djmac@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityCerin, E=rp00890en_US
dc.identifier.authorityMacfarlane, DJ=rp00934en_US
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/japa.20.4.402-
dc.identifier.pmid22186607-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84866664700en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros199218-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84866664700&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.spage402en_US
dc.identifier.epage420en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000308870100002-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCerin, E=14522064200en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBarnett, A=35195335800en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, MC=36665979500en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSit, CHP=55365732600en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMacfarlane, DJ=7202978517en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, WM=7403914485en_US
dc.identifier.issnl1063-8652-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats