File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.04.017
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-37249058271
- PMID: 17561318
- WOS: WOS:000253016800006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system
Title | Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Imaging Reproducibility Stereophotogrammetry Validation |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Churchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bjom |
Citation | British Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2008, v. 46 n. 1, p. 27-32 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objective: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional imaging system (Di3D). Design: The three-dimensional imaging system was validated in vitro using 12 adult facial plaster casts, which had landmarks marked, and the positions of the landmarks on the three-dimensional images captured by Di3D were compared with those obtained by a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). Methods: Operator error was measured by repeatedly locating landmarks on the three-dimensional image. Reproducibility error of the images was calculated by capturing three-dimensional images of the facial casts on two separate occasions; the Euclidean distance between the two matched sets of coordinates was then calculated. The Di3D system error was assessed by calculating the three-dimensional global positions of landmarks on the three-dimensional images and comparing them with those obtained by CMM (gold standard). Results: The operator error in placement of landmarks on the three-dimensional model was 0.07 mm, range 0.02-0.11 mm. The reproducibility of the Di3D capture was 0.13 mm, range 0.11-0.14 mm. The mean distance between the CMM and Di3D landmarks, which constitutes the Di3D system error, was an average of 0.21 mm, range 0.14-0.32 mm. Conclusions: The Di3D system error was within 0.2 mm, which is clinically acceptable, and offers considerable improvement in stereophotogrammetry for facial capture and analysis. © 2007 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/174214 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.572 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Khambay, B | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nairn, N | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bell, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Miller, J | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Bowman, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ayoub, AF | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-22T01:58:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-22T01:58:37Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | British Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgery, 2008, v. 46 n. 1, p. 27-32 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0266-4356 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/174214 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional imaging system (Di3D). Design: The three-dimensional imaging system was validated in vitro using 12 adult facial plaster casts, which had landmarks marked, and the positions of the landmarks on the three-dimensional images captured by Di3D were compared with those obtained by a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). Methods: Operator error was measured by repeatedly locating landmarks on the three-dimensional image. Reproducibility error of the images was calculated by capturing three-dimensional images of the facial casts on two separate occasions; the Euclidean distance between the two matched sets of coordinates was then calculated. The Di3D system error was assessed by calculating the three-dimensional global positions of landmarks on the three-dimensional images and comparing them with those obtained by CMM (gold standard). Results: The operator error in placement of landmarks on the three-dimensional model was 0.07 mm, range 0.02-0.11 mm. The reproducibility of the Di3D capture was 0.13 mm, range 0.11-0.14 mm. The mean distance between the CMM and Di3D landmarks, which constitutes the Di3D system error, was an average of 0.21 mm, range 0.14-0.32 mm. Conclusions: The Di3D system error was within 0.2 mm, which is clinically acceptable, and offers considerable improvement in stereophotogrammetry for facial capture and analysis. © 2007 The British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Churchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/bjom | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Imaging | - |
dc.subject | Reproducibility | - |
dc.subject | Stereophotogrammetry | - |
dc.subject | Validation | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Analog-Digital Conversion | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cephalometry - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Face - Anatomy & Histology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Image Processing, Computer-Assisted | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Imaging, Three-Dimensional - Methods - Standards | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Photogrammetry - Methods | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reproducibility Of Results | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Software Validation | en_US |
dc.title | Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Khambay, B: bkhambay@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Khambay, B=rp01691 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.bjoms.2007.04.017 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17561318 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-37249058271 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-37249058271&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 46 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 32 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000253016800006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Khambay, B=7003979053 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Nairn, N=23091238000 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Bell, A=17342029300 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Miller, J=35547207900 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Bowman, A=7102427278 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ayoub, AF=7005361507 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0266-4356 | - |