File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/00207543.2011.638942
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84867362906
- WOS: WOS:000310595700020
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The performance of due date setting rules in assembly and multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation
Title | The performance of due date setting rules in assembly and multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Assembly job shop Assembly operations Complex products Due dates Due-date setting |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00207543.asp |
Citation | International Journal of Production Research, 2012, n. 50, p. 5949-5965 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Setting short yet reliable Due Dates (DDs) is an important early production planning and control task. The majority of job-shop research on DD setting assumes simple product structures without assembly operations. However, in practice, product structures are often complex, and multiple final assembly operations may be required. This paper evaluates the performance of DD setting rules in the context of complex product structures, considering two scenarios: two-level assembly job shops, where orders converge on one final assembly operation; and two-level multi-stage job shops, where a series of assembly operations are undertaken. New rules are proposed which are substantially simpler and more suitable for practical use than those in the literature. These rules are only outperformed by a more sophisticated rule from the wider literature, newly introduced into the context of assembly and multi-stage job shops. Which rule to apply in practice depends on whether a manager considers the improvement in performance more important than the loss of simplicity. Future research should investigate how jobs can be planned and controlled effectively when some or all DDs are set externally by customers rather than internally using a DD setting rule. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/174120 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 7.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.668 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Thurer, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Huang, G | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Stevenson, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Silva, C | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Filho, MG | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-16T03:35:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-16T03:35:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Production Research, 2012, n. 50, p. 5949-5965 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0020-7543 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/174120 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Setting short yet reliable Due Dates (DDs) is an important early production planning and control task. The majority of job-shop research on DD setting assumes simple product structures without assembly operations. However, in practice, product structures are often complex, and multiple final assembly operations may be required. This paper evaluates the performance of DD setting rules in the context of complex product structures, considering two scenarios: two-level assembly job shops, where orders converge on one final assembly operation; and two-level multi-stage job shops, where a series of assembly operations are undertaken. New rules are proposed which are substantially simpler and more suitable for practical use than those in the literature. These rules are only outperformed by a more sophisticated rule from the wider literature, newly introduced into the context of assembly and multi-stage job shops. Which rule to apply in practice depends on whether a manager considers the improvement in performance more important than the loss of simplicity. Future research should investigate how jobs can be planned and controlled effectively when some or all DDs are set externally by customers rather than internally using a DD setting rule. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00207543.asp | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Production Research | en_US |
dc.subject | Assembly job shop | - |
dc.subject | Assembly operations | - |
dc.subject | Complex products | - |
dc.subject | Due dates | - |
dc.subject | Due-date setting | - |
dc.title | The performance of due date setting rules in assembly and multi-stage job shops: an assessment by simulation | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Thurer, M: mailboxmatthiasthurer@gmail.com | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Huang, G: gqhuang@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Huang, GQ=rp00118 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00207543.2011.638942 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84867362906 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 212383 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 50 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 5949 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 5965 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000310595700020 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0020-7543 | - |