File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical use of a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap

TitleClinical use of a pedicled anterolateral thigh flap
Authors
KeywordsAnterolateral thigh flap
Genital reconstruction
Groin reconstruction
Pedicle flap
Perineal reconstruction
Vagina reconstruction
Issue Date2008
PublisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707671/description#description
Citation
Journal Of Plastic, Reconstructive And Aesthetic Surgery, 2008, v. 61 n. 2, p. 158-164 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Anterolateral thigh flap is a safe and reliable flap for soft tissue reconstruction. It has successfully been used as free flap reconstruction for defects in the head and neck region, the upper extremities and lower extremities. However, there were only a few reports in the literature concerning the clinical application of this flap for regional reconstruction. Methods: The authors describe their experience of using the pedicled island anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in neighbouring areas. Representative cases are presented for illustration. Result: Between July 2005 and September 2006, seven patients underwent an immediate reconstruction with pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. The patients were between 49 and 69 years old. The size of the flaps measured from 5 × 8 cm to 15 × 15 cm. They were prepared as myocutaneous flaps in three cases and as perforator flaps in four cases. One patient, who had the largest flap harvested, needed skin grafting of the donor site. Primary closure was performed for all other cases. All flaps survived without any vascular compromise and the donor site healed without complication. Conclusion: Our study has shown that the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap is a safe and reliable flap for repair of defects at the internal pelvis, lateral thigh, groin, and genitoperineal region. The long vascular pedicle and having no restriction to the arc of rotation are keys to the successful transposition of the flap for immediate reconstruction of soft tissue defects in neighbouring areas. © 2007 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/172955
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 2.7
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.855
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, RWMen_US
dc.contributor.authorChan, JYWen_US
dc.contributor.authorMok, Ven_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, GKHen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:26:01Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:26:01Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Plastic, Reconstructive And Aesthetic Surgery, 2008, v. 61 n. 2, p. 158-164en_US
dc.identifier.issn1748-6815en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/172955-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Anterolateral thigh flap is a safe and reliable flap for soft tissue reconstruction. It has successfully been used as free flap reconstruction for defects in the head and neck region, the upper extremities and lower extremities. However, there were only a few reports in the literature concerning the clinical application of this flap for regional reconstruction. Methods: The authors describe their experience of using the pedicled island anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in neighbouring areas. Representative cases are presented for illustration. Result: Between July 2005 and September 2006, seven patients underwent an immediate reconstruction with pedicled anterolateral thigh flap. The patients were between 49 and 69 years old. The size of the flaps measured from 5 × 8 cm to 15 × 15 cm. They were prepared as myocutaneous flaps in three cases and as perforator flaps in four cases. One patient, who had the largest flap harvested, needed skin grafting of the donor site. Primary closure was performed for all other cases. All flaps survived without any vascular compromise and the donor site healed without complication. Conclusion: Our study has shown that the pedicled anterolateral thigh flap is a safe and reliable flap for repair of defects at the internal pelvis, lateral thigh, groin, and genitoperineal region. The long vascular pedicle and having no restriction to the arc of rotation are keys to the successful transposition of the flap for immediate reconstruction of soft tissue defects in neighbouring areas. © 2007 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/707671/description#descriptionen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectAnterolateral thigh flap-
dc.subjectGenital reconstruction-
dc.subjectGroin reconstruction-
dc.subjectPedicle flap-
dc.subjectPerineal reconstruction-
dc.subjectVagina reconstruction-
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshGenital Neoplasms, Male - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshGroin - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPelvis - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshPerineum - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshReconstructive Surgical Procedures - Methodsen_US
dc.subject.meshSurgical Flapsen_US
dc.subject.meshThigh - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.subject.meshUrethral Neoplasms - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshUterine Cervical Neoplasms - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshVagina - Surgeryen_US
dc.titleClinical use of a pedicled anterolateral thigh flapen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailChan, JYW: jywchan1@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityChan, JYW=rp01314en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.028en_US
dc.identifier.pmid18023266-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-38349048539en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-38349048539&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume61en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage158en_US
dc.identifier.epage164en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000253346800007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNg, RWM=7102153861en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, JYW=27171772200en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMok, V=23467468700en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLi, GKH=15034790200en_US
dc.identifier.issnl1748-6815-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats