File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Impact of leadership style and team context on psychological empowerment in construction project teams

TitleImpact of leadership style and team context on psychological empowerment in construction project teams
Authors
KeywordsHong Kong
Person Orientated Leadership
Psychological Empowerment
Span Of Control
Task Orientated Leadership
Team Interdependence
Issue Date2010
Citation
Association Of Researchers In Construction Management, Arcom 2010 - Proceedings Of The 26Th Annual Conference, 2010, p. 411-420 How to Cite?
AbstractThe empowerment process makes huge demands on organizations and its constituents. The team as the proximal work environment creates a social environment for interactions that can change individual behaviour, attitudes and perceptions. Leadership provides a direct channel through which individuals interpret organizational policies and practices. The impact of leadership style and team context on psychological empowerment in project teams was examined using data from a parallel questionnaire survey of construction client, consultant and contractor organizations in Hong Kong. It was posited that span of control and interdependence will positively and significantly influence psychological empowerment. Person orientated leadership style was expected to positively impact psychological empowerment while task orientated leadership style was expected to have a negative impact. No significant relationship was found between span of control and psychological empowerment while team interdependence had a positive and significant relationship with psychological empowerment. Task orientated leadership was positively and significantly related to psychological empowerment in the full sample and contractor teams but not in consultant and client teams. Person orientated leadership was positively and significantly related to psychological empowerment in the full sample, consultant and client teams but not in contractor teams. The distinct findings in relation to the leadership style-empowerment link are consistent with a systems perspective of the construction process. Client and consultant teams constitute a "managing sub-system" and rely on management of interrelationships (i.e. person orientated leadership) to succeed while contractor teams constitute the "operating/task sub-system" and rely on task performance (i.e. task orientated leadership). The findings add to the growing evidence of lack of support for the stereotypical views on how task and person orientated leadership styles manifest. In project settings where "getting the job done" and "teamwork" are inseparable both leadership styles can produce positive outcomes through "leadership adjustment".
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169129
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTuuli, MMen_US
dc.contributor.authorRowlinson, Sen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-08T03:44:47Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-08T03:44:47Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.citationAssociation Of Researchers In Construction Management, Arcom 2010 - Proceedings Of The 26Th Annual Conference, 2010, p. 411-420en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/169129-
dc.description.abstractThe empowerment process makes huge demands on organizations and its constituents. The team as the proximal work environment creates a social environment for interactions that can change individual behaviour, attitudes and perceptions. Leadership provides a direct channel through which individuals interpret organizational policies and practices. The impact of leadership style and team context on psychological empowerment in project teams was examined using data from a parallel questionnaire survey of construction client, consultant and contractor organizations in Hong Kong. It was posited that span of control and interdependence will positively and significantly influence psychological empowerment. Person orientated leadership style was expected to positively impact psychological empowerment while task orientated leadership style was expected to have a negative impact. No significant relationship was found between span of control and psychological empowerment while team interdependence had a positive and significant relationship with psychological empowerment. Task orientated leadership was positively and significantly related to psychological empowerment in the full sample and contractor teams but not in consultant and client teams. Person orientated leadership was positively and significantly related to psychological empowerment in the full sample, consultant and client teams but not in contractor teams. The distinct findings in relation to the leadership style-empowerment link are consistent with a systems perspective of the construction process. Client and consultant teams constitute a "managing sub-system" and rely on management of interrelationships (i.e. person orientated leadership) to succeed while contractor teams constitute the "operating/task sub-system" and rely on task performance (i.e. task orientated leadership). The findings add to the growing evidence of lack of support for the stereotypical views on how task and person orientated leadership styles manifest. In project settings where "getting the job done" and "teamwork" are inseparable both leadership styles can produce positive outcomes through "leadership adjustment".en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAssociation of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2010 - Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conferenceen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectPerson Orientated Leadershipen_US
dc.subjectPsychological Empowermenten_US
dc.subjectSpan Of Controlen_US
dc.subjectTask Orientated Leadershipen_US
dc.subjectTeam Interdependenceen_US
dc.titleImpact of leadership style and team context on psychological empowerment in construction project teamsen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailRowlinson, S:hrecsmr@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityRowlinson, S=rp01020en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84861073983en_US
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861073983&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.spage411en_US
dc.identifier.epage420en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTuuli, MM=8257221700en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRowlinson, S=7003696228en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats