File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1177/0162243907306705
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-48949089462
- WOS: WOS:000258596000005
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Bookmarks:
- CiteULike: 5
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Technology and institutions: A critical appraisal of GIS in the planning domain
Title | Technology and institutions: A critical appraisal of GIS in the planning domain |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Critical theory GIS Public policy Science and technology studies |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Sage Publications, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journal.aspx?pid=111 |
Citation | Science Technology And Human Values, 2008, v. 33 n. 5, p. 653-678 How to Cite? |
Abstract | GIS (Geographic Information Systems) has captured planning practice to an unprecedented degree, and this article on how it reconfigures and is configured by institutional context. The author inquires into GIS as a technology for incorporating knowledge into institutional use and includes five propositions: (1) GIS's efficiencies in data processing allows it unprecedented facility and scope of analysis, (2) its use increases alienation, (3) its mimetic language furthers its role in planning, (4) its logic appears rational-purposive, but it conceals an underlying normative logic, and (5) its most profound effect is on the mapper, and the alienating and normative character of GIS necessitate new modes of "social ground-truthing." The author studies the southeast Los Angeles (SELA) initiatives to demonstrate these propositions. This article compares two studies: one GIS-based, and the other based on participatory action research and discusses how GIS might be recontextualized into a technology for liberating democratizing processes. © 2008 Sage Publications. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167159 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.232 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lejano, RP | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-28T04:04:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-28T04:04:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Science Technology And Human Values, 2008, v. 33 n. 5, p. 653-678 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0162-2439 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/167159 | - |
dc.description.abstract | GIS (Geographic Information Systems) has captured planning practice to an unprecedented degree, and this article on how it reconfigures and is configured by institutional context. The author inquires into GIS as a technology for incorporating knowledge into institutional use and includes five propositions: (1) GIS's efficiencies in data processing allows it unprecedented facility and scope of analysis, (2) its use increases alienation, (3) its mimetic language furthers its role in planning, (4) its logic appears rational-purposive, but it conceals an underlying normative logic, and (5) its most profound effect is on the mapper, and the alienating and normative character of GIS necessitate new modes of "social ground-truthing." The author studies the southeast Los Angeles (SELA) initiatives to demonstrate these propositions. This article compares two studies: one GIS-based, and the other based on participatory action research and discusses how GIS might be recontextualized into a technology for liberating democratizing processes. © 2008 Sage Publications. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sage Publications, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journal.aspx?pid=111 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Science Technology and Human Values | en_HK |
dc.subject | Critical theory | en_HK |
dc.subject | GIS | en_HK |
dc.subject | Public policy | en_HK |
dc.subject | Science and technology studies | en_HK |
dc.title | Technology and institutions: A critical appraisal of GIS in the planning domain | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lejano, RP: lejano@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lejano, RP=rp01666 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0162243907306705 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-48949089462 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-48949089462&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 653 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 678 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000258596000005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lejano, RP=6602298801 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 3206279 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0162-2439 | - |