File Download
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Tibet and China’s ‘National Minority’ Policies
Title | Tibet and China’s ‘National Minority’ Policies |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Publisher | Foundation for Non-Violent Alternatives (FNVA). |
Citation | The 2012 Conference on Current State of Affairs in Tibet: Reasons?, New Delhi, India, 21 April 2012. In Current State of Affairs in Tibet: Reasons? Conference Proceedings, 2012, p. 12-28 How to Cite? |
Abstract | China’s hardline and repressive policies have often stood in the way of its acceptance on the international stage. This legacy has nowhere been more evident than with respect to its national minority policies applied in Tibet. While China long ago in the 1951 17-point Agreement agreed to provide autonomy to Tibetans it has never delivered on this promise, offering repression and assimilation instead. In nearly every diplomatic outing, as was especially evident in the lead up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics, China’s Tibet policies have been an issue. With the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the 2008 Tibetan Memorandum on Genuine Autonomy for the Tibetan People China surely has excellent guidance for a more humane policy to meet Tibetan concerns. With reference to its historical legacy and international standards, this paper encourages China to embrace such policy reform. |
Description | Tibet Series II, April 2012 |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/166263 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Davis, MC | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-20T08:31:03Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-20T08:31:03Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | The 2012 Conference on Current State of Affairs in Tibet: Reasons?, New Delhi, India, 21 April 2012. In Current State of Affairs in Tibet: Reasons? Conference Proceedings, 2012, p. 12-28 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/166263 | - |
dc.description | Tibet Series II, April 2012 | - |
dc.description.abstract | China’s hardline and repressive policies have often stood in the way of its acceptance on the international stage. This legacy has nowhere been more evident than with respect to its national minority policies applied in Tibet. While China long ago in the 1951 17-point Agreement agreed to provide autonomy to Tibetans it has never delivered on this promise, offering repression and assimilation instead. In nearly every diplomatic outing, as was especially evident in the lead up to the 2008 Beijing Olympics, China’s Tibet policies have been an issue. With the 2007 UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the 2008 Tibetan Memorandum on Genuine Autonomy for the Tibetan People China surely has excellent guidance for a more humane policy to meet Tibetan concerns. With reference to its historical legacy and international standards, this paper encourages China to embrace such policy reform. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Foundation for Non-Violent Alternatives (FNVA). | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Current State of Affairs in Tibet: Reasons? Conference Proceedings | en_US |
dc.title | Tibet and China’s ‘National Minority’ Policies | en_US |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Davis, MC: mcdavis@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 207082 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 12 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 28 | - |
dc.publisher.place | India | - |
dc.customcontrol.immutable | sml 140611 | - |