File Download
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Cross-linguistic differences in implicit language learning

TitleCross-linguistic differences in implicit language learning
Authors
KeywordsImplicit learning
Second Language Acquisition
Language Acquisition
Issue Date2012
PublisherAMLaP 2012.
Citation
The 2012 International Conference of Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2012), Riva del Garda, Italy, 6-8 September 2012. In Book of Abstracts, 2012, p. 189 How to Cite?
AbstractImplicit learning is generally characterised as a domain-general associative learning mechanism that will acquire any contingencies between attended stimuli. Many aspects of a first and second language are assumed to be acquired implicitly, but many linguistic approaches also propose that learning is constrained by prior linguistic knowledge (deriving either from Universal Grammar or, in the case of second language acquisition, from the first language). This view predicts that only certain contingencies in the input will be acquired. Here we investigate the contribution of linguistic constraints on adult implicit language learning using a miniature linguistic system and a reaction time methodology. We examined acquisition of agreement between novel determiners and their accompanying nouns. Native English-...
DescriptionPoster Session 4: no. 189
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/166172

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, JNen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Jen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T08:29:47Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T08:29:47Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe 2012 International Conference of Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing (AMLaP 2012), Riva del Garda, Italy, 6-8 September 2012. In Book of Abstracts, 2012, p. 189en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/166172-
dc.descriptionPoster Session 4: no. 189-
dc.description.abstractImplicit learning is generally characterised as a domain-general associative learning mechanism that will acquire any contingencies between attended stimuli. Many aspects of a first and second language are assumed to be acquired implicitly, but many linguistic approaches also propose that learning is constrained by prior linguistic knowledge (deriving either from Universal Grammar or, in the case of second language acquisition, from the first language). This view predicts that only certain contingencies in the input will be acquired. Here we investigate the contribution of linguistic constraints on adult implicit language learning using a miniature linguistic system and a reaction time methodology. We examined acquisition of agreement between novel determiners and their accompanying nouns. Native English-...-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherAMLaP 2012.-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Conference of Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, AMLaP 2012en_US
dc.subjectImplicit learning-
dc.subjectSecond Language Acquisition-
dc.subjectLanguage Acquisition-
dc.titleCross-linguistic differences in implicit language learningen_US
dc.typeConference_Paperen_US
dc.identifier.emailLeung, J: hiuchi@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, J=rp01168en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros208631en_US
dc.identifier.spage189-
dc.identifier.epage189-
dc.publisher.placeItaly-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats