File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Bribes and the constructive trust as a chameleon

TitleBribes and the constructive trust as a chameleon
Authors
Ho, L
KeywordsAustralia
Breach of fiduciary duty
Bribery
Constructive trusts
De facto directors
Issue Date2012
PublisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.
Citation
The Law Quarterly Review, 2012, v. 128, p. 485-489 How to Cite?
AbstractExamines the Australian Federal Court of Appeal decision in Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No. 2) on whether there was sufficient evidence to show that the appellant was a de facto director who had owed fiduciary duties to the respondent company, and considers whether these had been breached by his receiving secret commission, misappropriating corporate funds, and failing to disclose his personal interest in the use of these funds. Assesses whether a constructive trust could be asserted over benefits acquired from bribery and secret commissions. 'Abstract by Sweet & Maxwell' © 2013 Sweet & Maxwell
DescriptionCase Comment
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/164151
ISSN
0023-933X

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHo, Len_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T07:56:01Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T07:56:01Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Law Quarterly Review, 2012, v. 128, p. 485-489en_US
dc.identifier.issn0023-933X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/164151-
dc.descriptionCase Comment-
dc.description.abstractExamines the Australian Federal Court of Appeal decision in Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No. 2) on whether there was sufficient evidence to show that the appellant was a de facto director who had owed fiduciary duties to the respondent company, and considers whether these had been breached by his receiving secret commission, misappropriating corporate funds, and failing to disclose his personal interest in the use of these funds. Assesses whether a constructive trust could be asserted over benefits acquired from bribery and secret commissions. 'Abstract by Sweet & Maxwell' © 2013 Sweet & Maxwell-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwell Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Law Quarterly Reviewen_US
dc.subjectAustralia-
dc.subjectBreach of fiduciary duty-
dc.subjectBribery-
dc.subjectConstructive trusts-
dc.subjectDe facto directors-
dc.titleBribes and the constructive trust as a chameleonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailHo, L: lusinaho@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityHo, LKS=rp01250en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros209472en_US
dc.identifier.volume128en_US
dc.identifier.spage485en_US
dc.identifier.epage489en_US
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0023-933X-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats