File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage

TitleFracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage
Authors
Issue Date2012
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2591
Citation
International Endodontic Journal, 2012, v. 45 n. 6, p. 524-529 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To evaluate the fracture resistance and fracture patterns of root filled maxillary first premolar teeth (with mesio-occlusal cavity preparation) restored with several composite restoration designs. Methodology: One hundred extracted sound human maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1 remained untreated (negative control). Conventional root canal treatment with additional mesial-occlusal cavity preparation was carried out on teeth in groups 2-5. In group 2, the teeth were restored intra-coronally with direct composite resin (positive control). In group 3, the palatal cusps of the teeth were reduced, and the cavities were restored with composite resin covering the palatal cusp (partial coverage). In group 4, the buccal and palatal cusps along with the distal marginal ridges were reduced; the cavities and cusps were restored with composite resin (conventional full coverage). In group 5, the buccal and palatal cusps were reduced but the distal marginal ridges were conserved. The cavities and the cusps were restored with composite resin (modified full coverage). All teeth were subjected to a progressive compressive loading parallel to their longitudinal axis until fracture. Fracture resistance was analysed using the one-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test. Fracture patterns were analyzed with chi-square test. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The fracture resistance (mean ± SD) of groups 1-5 was 1131 ± 207N, 904 ± 184N, 927 ± 224N, 1095 ± 289N and 1085 ± 243N, respectively (groups 1, 4, 5 > groups 2, 3; P = 0.004). Cusp fractures were recorded as the fracture pattern in 20 (100%), 19 (95%), 16 (80%), 8 (40%) and 12 (60%) premolars in groups 1-5, respectively (groups 1, 2 > groups 4, 5; group 3 > group 4; P < 0.001). Conclusions: When direct composite resin was used to restore root filled maxillary first premolar teeth involving a proximal surface, those restored with full-coverage designs had greater fracture resistance.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/163710
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.155
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXie, KX-
dc.contributor.authorWang, XY-
dc.contributor.authorGao, XJ-
dc.contributor.authorYuan, CY-
dc.contributor.authorLi, JX-
dc.contributor.authorChu, CH-
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-20T07:50:27Z-
dc.date.available2012-09-20T07:50:27Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Endodontic Journal, 2012, v. 45 n. 6, p. 524-529-
dc.identifier.issn0143-2885-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/163710-
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate the fracture resistance and fracture patterns of root filled maxillary first premolar teeth (with mesio-occlusal cavity preparation) restored with several composite restoration designs. Methodology: One hundred extracted sound human maxillary first premolars were randomly divided into five groups. Group 1 remained untreated (negative control). Conventional root canal treatment with additional mesial-occlusal cavity preparation was carried out on teeth in groups 2-5. In group 2, the teeth were restored intra-coronally with direct composite resin (positive control). In group 3, the palatal cusps of the teeth were reduced, and the cavities were restored with composite resin covering the palatal cusp (partial coverage). In group 4, the buccal and palatal cusps along with the distal marginal ridges were reduced; the cavities and cusps were restored with composite resin (conventional full coverage). In group 5, the buccal and palatal cusps were reduced but the distal marginal ridges were conserved. The cavities and the cusps were restored with composite resin (modified full coverage). All teeth were subjected to a progressive compressive loading parallel to their longitudinal axis until fracture. Fracture resistance was analysed using the one-way ANOVA and Fisher's LSD test. Fracture patterns were analyzed with chi-square test. The significance level was set at 0.05. Results: The fracture resistance (mean ± SD) of groups 1-5 was 1131 ± 207N, 904 ± 184N, 927 ± 224N, 1095 ± 289N and 1085 ± 243N, respectively (groups 1, 4, 5 > groups 2, 3; P = 0.004). Cusp fractures were recorded as the fracture pattern in 20 (100%), 19 (95%), 16 (80%), 8 (40%) and 12 (60%) premolars in groups 1-5, respectively (groups 1, 2 > groups 4, 5; group 3 > group 4; P < 0.001). Conclusions: When direct composite resin was used to restore root filled maxillary first premolar teeth involving a proximal surface, those restored with full-coverage designs had greater fracture resistance.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2591-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Endodontic Journal-
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: International Endodontic Journal, 2012, v. 45 n. 6, p. 524-529, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02005.x. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.-
dc.titleFracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChu, CH: chchu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChu, CH=rp00022-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02005.x-
dc.identifier.pmid22242600-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84862807335-
dc.identifier.hkuros205916-
dc.identifier.volume45-
dc.identifier.issue6-
dc.identifier.spage524-
dc.identifier.epage529-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000303802400004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats