File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Review article: treatments for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty

TitleReview article: treatments for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Qiu, YYYan, CHChiu, KYNg, FY
Issue Date2012
PublisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.josonline.org/
Citation
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2012, v. 20 n. 1, p. 78-86 How to Cite?
AbstractBone deficiency hinders implant alignment and stabilisation of the bone-implant interface in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Treatments for bone defects include bone cement, bone cement with screw reinforcement, metal augments, impaction bone grafts, structural allografts, and tantalum, depending on the location and size of the defects. Small defects are usually treated with cement, cement plus screws, or impaction allograft bone. Large defects are repaired with structural allografts or metal augments. Recent developments involve the use of highly porous osteoconductive tantalum. We reviewed the pros and cons of each method for bone defect management in revision TKA.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/159758
ISSN
1022-5536
2021 Impact Factor: 1.482
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.457
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000209171000016

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQiu, YYen_US
dc.contributor.authorYan, CHen_US
dc.contributor.authorChiu, KYen_US
dc.contributor.authorNg, FYen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-16T05:55:37Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-16T05:55:37Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 2012, v. 20 n. 1, p. 78-86en_US
dc.identifier.issn1022-5536-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/159758-
dc.description.abstractBone deficiency hinders implant alignment and stabilisation of the bone-implant interface in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Treatments for bone defects include bone cement, bone cement with screw reinforcement, metal augments, impaction bone grafts, structural allografts, and tantalum, depending on the location and size of the defects. Small defects are usually treated with cement, cement plus screws, or impaction allograft bone. Large defects are repaired with structural allografts or metal augments. Recent developments involve the use of highly porous osteoconductive tantalum. We reviewed the pros and cons of each method for bone defect management in revision TKA.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.josonline.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedic Surgeryen_US
dc.rightsJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery. Copyright © Hong Kong Academy of Medicine Press.-
dc.subject.meshArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - adverse effects-
dc.subject.meshBone Cements-
dc.subject.meshBone Resorption - etiology - therapy-
dc.subject.meshBone Transplantation-
dc.subject.meshOrthopedic Procedures - instrumentation - methods-
dc.titleReview article: treatments for bone loss in revision total knee arthroplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailYan, CH: yanchoi@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailChiu, KY: pkychiu@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.emailNg, FY: fyng@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityYan, CH=rp00303en_US
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, KY=rp00379en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid22535817-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84865138130-
dc.identifier.hkuros205302en_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage78-
dc.identifier.epage86-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000209171000016-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-
dc.identifier.issnl1022-5536-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats