File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s11282-011-0068-7
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-83655167362
- WOS: WOS:000297710400002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A new method for evaluating perceptible contrast information in digital intraoral radiographic systems
Title | A new method for evaluating perceptible contrast information in digital intraoral radiographic systems |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Digital Dental Radiography Digital Radiography Perception |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Citation | Oral Radiology, 2011, v. 27 n. 2, p. 98-101 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: To evaluate four digital intraoral radiographic systems using perceptibility curves (PCs) in a grayscale domain and to clarify the usefulness of this new method. Methods: Four systems were evaluated, namely the CDR, Dixel, Digora, and Digora Optime. An aluminum phantom with 12 steps was radiographed using all four systems. The mean gray values and their standard deviations were measured for each step as well as the background of the images for each device. The minimum perceptible gray level differences at a given exposure were calculated from the mean gray values and standard deviations, and a PC in the grayscale domain was constructed at each exposure for all devices. The area under the PC was assumed to be the perceptible contrast information at that exposure for each system. By combining the PCs at all exposures for each system, the maximum perceptible contrast information in each system was calculated. The correlation between the perceptible contrast information and the number of perceptible holes by observers at each exposure was examined for all four digital systems. Results: The Dixel and Digora Optime showed similar PCs, and their minimum perceptible gray level differences were the smallest among the systems. The correlation between the number of perceptible holes and the areas under the PCs at each exposure for the four systems was relatively high (r = 0.92). Conclusions: The areas under the PCs in a grayscale domain were highly correlated with observer performance. This method can be used to evaluate the image quality of new digital systems. © 2011 Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154693 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.602 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Okamura, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Yoshiura, K | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Tatsumi, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kawazu, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chikui, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Shimizu, M | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Goto, TK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-08T08:26:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-08T08:26:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Oral Radiology, 2011, v. 27 n. 2, p. 98-101 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0911-6028 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/154693 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To evaluate four digital intraoral radiographic systems using perceptibility curves (PCs) in a grayscale domain and to clarify the usefulness of this new method. Methods: Four systems were evaluated, namely the CDR, Dixel, Digora, and Digora Optime. An aluminum phantom with 12 steps was radiographed using all four systems. The mean gray values and their standard deviations were measured for each step as well as the background of the images for each device. The minimum perceptible gray level differences at a given exposure were calculated from the mean gray values and standard deviations, and a PC in the grayscale domain was constructed at each exposure for all devices. The area under the PC was assumed to be the perceptible contrast information at that exposure for each system. By combining the PCs at all exposures for each system, the maximum perceptible contrast information in each system was calculated. The correlation between the perceptible contrast information and the number of perceptible holes by observers at each exposure was examined for all four digital systems. Results: The Dixel and Digora Optime showed similar PCs, and their minimum perceptible gray level differences were the smallest among the systems. The correlation between the number of perceptible holes and the areas under the PCs at each exposure for the four systems was relatively high (r = 0.92). Conclusions: The areas under the PCs in a grayscale domain were highly correlated with observer performance. This method can be used to evaluate the image quality of new digital systems. © 2011 Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Oral Radiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Digital Dental Radiography | en_US |
dc.subject | Digital Radiography | en_US |
dc.subject | Perception | en_US |
dc.title | A new method for evaluating perceptible contrast information in digital intraoral radiographic systems | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Goto, TK:gototk@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Goto, TK=rp01434 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11282-011-0068-7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-83655167362 | en_US |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 203957 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-83655167362&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 98 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 101 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000297710400002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Japan | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Okamura, K=7402447805 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yoshiura, K=7006527913 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tatsumi, M=7102266632 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kawazu, T=7003856408 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chikui, T=35548505400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Shimizu, M=7404138590 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Goto, TK=7403938313 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 9436570 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0911-6028 | - |