File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Periodontal and pulpal conditions of abutment teeth. Status after four to eight years following the incorporation of fixed reconstructions.

TitlePeriodontal and pulpal conditions of abutment teeth. Status after four to eight years following the incorporation of fixed reconstructions.
Authors
Issue Date1989
Citation
Schweizer Monatsschrift Fur Zahnmedizin = Revue Mensuelle Suisse DOdonto-Stomatologie = Rivista Mensile Svizzera Di Odontologia E Stomatologia / Sso, 1989, v. 99 n. 12, p. 1381-1385 How to Cite?
AbstractIn the present retrospective clinical study, 58 patients were examined 4 to 8 years (median 77 months) following the incorporation of a fixed reconstruction. No regular maintenance care had been provided during the interval period. The periodontal conditions represented by the Plaque Control Record (PCR), the Gingival Index (GI) and pocket probing depths were examined on 182 abutment teeth of 94 reconstructions. Pulpal vitality and periapical pathology were assessed clinically as well as radiographically. The periodontal parameters of the abutment teeth were compared with homologous contralateral uncrowned teeth. Significantly higher plaque prevalence, gingival indices, and pocket probing depths were found in the crowned teeth. Also, bleeding on probing was observed more frequently whenever the crown margins were located subgingivally. At the end of the interval period, 3.7% of the originally vital abutments had lost their vitality. A technical failure rate of 7.4% with no apparent differences between conventional and extension bridges was noted. This study indicates that even with precise marginal fit and in the absence of a regular maintenance program, the supragingival location of the crown margin is more favourable than the subgingival location for the maintenance of oral health.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153692
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorReichenGraden, Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-08T08:21:04Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-08T08:21:04Z-
dc.date.issued1989en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchweizer Monatsschrift Fur Zahnmedizin = Revue Mensuelle Suisse DOdonto-Stomatologie = Rivista Mensile Svizzera Di Odontologia E Stomatologia / Sso, 1989, v. 99 n. 12, p. 1381-1385en_US
dc.identifier.issn1011-4203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/153692-
dc.description.abstractIn the present retrospective clinical study, 58 patients were examined 4 to 8 years (median 77 months) following the incorporation of a fixed reconstruction. No regular maintenance care had been provided during the interval period. The periodontal conditions represented by the Plaque Control Record (PCR), the Gingival Index (GI) and pocket probing depths were examined on 182 abutment teeth of 94 reconstructions. Pulpal vitality and periapical pathology were assessed clinically as well as radiographically. The periodontal parameters of the abutment teeth were compared with homologous contralateral uncrowned teeth. Significantly higher plaque prevalence, gingival indices, and pocket probing depths were found in the crowned teeth. Also, bleeding on probing was observed more frequently whenever the crown margins were located subgingivally. At the end of the interval period, 3.7% of the originally vital abutments had lost their vitality. A technical failure rate of 7.4% with no apparent differences between conventional and extension bridges was noted. This study indicates that even with precise marginal fit and in the absence of a regular maintenance program, the supragingival location of the crown margin is more favourable than the subgingival location for the maintenance of oral health.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSchweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnmedizin = Revue mensuelle suisse d"odonto-stomatologie = Rivista mensile svizzera di odontologia e stomatologia / SSOen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshCrownsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Abutmentsen_US
dc.subject.meshDental Pulp Testen_US
dc.subject.meshDenture, Partial, Fixeden_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPeriodontal Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshProsthesis Failureen_US
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_US
dc.titlePeriodontal and pulpal conditions of abutment teeth. Status after four to eight years following the incorporation of fixed reconstructions.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid2701195en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0024825704en_US
dc.identifier.volume99en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.spage1381en_US
dc.identifier.epage1385en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridReichenGraden, S=6506500645en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_US

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats