File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A new concept of continental construction in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt: (Compared to actualistic examples from the Western Pacific)

TitleA new concept of continental construction in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt: (Compared to actualistic examples from the Western Pacific)
Authors
Issue Date2011
PublisherInternational Union of Geological Sciences. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.episodes.co.in/
Citation
Episodes, 2011, v. 34 n. 3, p. 186-196 How to Cite?
AbstractA new concept of continental construction based on four main terms: (1) crustal growth, (2) crustal formation, (3) continental growth and (4) continental formation is presented here. Each of these terms reflects a certain process responsible for the formation of what we call now "continental crust". This concept is applied to the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB), which is a global major accretionary orogen formed after the closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean, and to its actualistic analogues - orogenic belts and accretionary complexes of the Western Pacific. The main focuses of the paper are the state of activities in the study of the CAOB, the theoretical basics of the new concept of continental construction, its challenges, prospects and social impacts, main methods of investigation. The main issues of the paper are what has been done in this field of geoscience, which questions remained unaddressed and which problems should be solved. The most important challenges are: (a) dominantly Phanerozoic formation of the CAOB continental crust versus its dominantly Archean growth; (b) to what extent the CAOB continental crust was juvenile or recycled; (c) whether magmatic arcs or Gondwana-derived terranes were accreted to the Siberian, Kazakhstan, Tarim and North China cratons; (d) what was the balance between continental formation and tectonic erosion based on modern examples from the Western Pacific; (e) what social benefits (mineral deposits) and geohazards (seismicity and volcanism) can be inferred from the study of orogenic belts formed in place of former oceans.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/151345
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.583
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSafonova, Ien_US
dc.contributor.authorSeltmann, Een_US
dc.contributor.authorKröner, Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorGladkochub, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorSchulmann, Ken_US
dc.contributor.authorXiao, Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Jen_US
dc.contributor.authorKomiya, Ten_US
dc.contributor.authorSun, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-26T06:20:53Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-26T06:20:53Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.citationEpisodes, 2011, v. 34 n. 3, p. 186-196en_US
dc.identifier.issn0705-3797en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/151345-
dc.description.abstractA new concept of continental construction based on four main terms: (1) crustal growth, (2) crustal formation, (3) continental growth and (4) continental formation is presented here. Each of these terms reflects a certain process responsible for the formation of what we call now "continental crust". This concept is applied to the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB), which is a global major accretionary orogen formed after the closure of the Paleo-Asian Ocean, and to its actualistic analogues - orogenic belts and accretionary complexes of the Western Pacific. The main focuses of the paper are the state of activities in the study of the CAOB, the theoretical basics of the new concept of continental construction, its challenges, prospects and social impacts, main methods of investigation. The main issues of the paper are what has been done in this field of geoscience, which questions remained unaddressed and which problems should be solved. The most important challenges are: (a) dominantly Phanerozoic formation of the CAOB continental crust versus its dominantly Archean growth; (b) to what extent the CAOB continental crust was juvenile or recycled; (c) whether magmatic arcs or Gondwana-derived terranes were accreted to the Siberian, Kazakhstan, Tarim and North China cratons; (d) what was the balance between continental formation and tectonic erosion based on modern examples from the Western Pacific; (e) what social benefits (mineral deposits) and geohazards (seismicity and volcanism) can be inferred from the study of orogenic belts formed in place of former oceans.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherInternational Union of Geological Sciences. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.episodes.co.in/en_US
dc.relation.ispartofEpisodesen_US
dc.titleA new concept of continental construction in the Central Asian Orogenic Belt: (Compared to actualistic examples from the Western Pacific)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailSun, M:minsun@hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authoritySun, M=rp00780en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-82055194593en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros205429-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-82055194593&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.spage186en_US
dc.identifier.epage196en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000301312500005-
dc.publisher.placeChinaen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSafonova, I=7003902437en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSeltmann, E=54780609100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKröner, A=7006453132en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridGladkochub, D=35464490200en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSchulmann, K=7004553562en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridXiao, W=7202456615en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKim, J=54406031100en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKomiya, T=35248473800en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSun, M=25932315800en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0705-3797-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats