File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Adopting non-privately funded public-private partnerships in maintenance projects: A case study in Hong Kong

TitleAdopting non-privately funded public-private partnerships in maintenance projects: A case study in Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsFacilities
Hong Kong
Maintenance
Partnership
Private Finance
Issue Date2006
PublisherEmerald Group Publishing Limited. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ecam.htm
Citation
Engineering, Construction And Architectural Management, 2006, v. 13 n. 2, p. 186-200 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose - The purpose of this paper is to establish whether this type of approach is suitable for maintenance schemes from the perspective of both the public agent and the service provider. Until recently, non-privately funded public-private partnerships have been adopted for the maintenance of infrastructure facilities. Design/methodology/approach - In this study, stakeholders involved in a trial of a non-privately funded public-private partnerships project were invited to express their opinions on the success and pitfalls of this type of scheme. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 12 management and front-line staff of the public and private partners to capture their opinions on the project. A questionnaire survey was also conducted to uncover the views and standpoints of other stakeholders on PPP. A total of 33 respondents completed the questionnaire. Findings - The results indicate that the non-privately funded PPP approach is more cost-effective and efficient in the delivery of maintenance services when compared with the traditional term contract. The performance-based payment mechanism adopted could help improve the quality of maintenance services performed by the contractor. The inspection and programming tasks are transferred to the service provider relieving the workload of the public agency. Most stakeholders who participated in this study agreed that the non-privately funded PPP approach can allow higher flexibility, encourage innovation, enhance cost-effectiveness and improve the efficiency of work when compared with the traditional term contract in the delivery of maintenance services. Originality/value - This paper provides a general introduction to the method adopted in the non-privately funded public-private partnerships approach with particular reference to the maintenance of infrastructure schemes. More important, the potentials and pitfalls of using this type of mechanism with maintenance projects are examined, which helps enhance understanding of this rather unexplored topic. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/150354
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.896
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNg, STen_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, YMWen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-26T06:03:46Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-26T06:03:46Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.citationEngineering, Construction And Architectural Management, 2006, v. 13 n. 2, p. 186-200en_US
dc.identifier.issn0969-9988en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/150354-
dc.description.abstractPurpose - The purpose of this paper is to establish whether this type of approach is suitable for maintenance schemes from the perspective of both the public agent and the service provider. Until recently, non-privately funded public-private partnerships have been adopted for the maintenance of infrastructure facilities. Design/methodology/approach - In this study, stakeholders involved in a trial of a non-privately funded public-private partnerships project were invited to express their opinions on the success and pitfalls of this type of scheme. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 12 management and front-line staff of the public and private partners to capture their opinions on the project. A questionnaire survey was also conducted to uncover the views and standpoints of other stakeholders on PPP. A total of 33 respondents completed the questionnaire. Findings - The results indicate that the non-privately funded PPP approach is more cost-effective and efficient in the delivery of maintenance services when compared with the traditional term contract. The performance-based payment mechanism adopted could help improve the quality of maintenance services performed by the contractor. The inspection and programming tasks are transferred to the service provider relieving the workload of the public agency. Most stakeholders who participated in this study agreed that the non-privately funded PPP approach can allow higher flexibility, encourage innovation, enhance cost-effectiveness and improve the efficiency of work when compared with the traditional term contract in the delivery of maintenance services. Originality/value - This paper provides a general introduction to the method adopted in the non-privately funded public-private partnerships approach with particular reference to the maintenance of infrastructure schemes. More important, the potentials and pitfalls of using this type of mechanism with maintenance projects are examined, which helps enhance understanding of this rather unexplored topic. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.en_US
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limited. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ecam.htmen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEngineering, Construction and Architectural Managementen_US
dc.subjectFacilitiesen_US
dc.subjectHong Kongen_US
dc.subjectMaintenanceen_US
dc.subjectPartnershipen_US
dc.subjectPrivate Financeen_US
dc.titleAdopting non-privately funded public-private partnerships in maintenance projects: A case study in Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.emailNg, ST:tstng@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityNg, ST=rp00158en_US
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/09699980610659634en_US
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33645219488en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros119074-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33645219488&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_US
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.spage186en_US
dc.identifier.epage200en_US
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000211605300006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNg, ST=7403358853en_US
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, YMW=12792232500en_US
dc.identifier.issnl0969-9988-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats