File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Book Chapter: Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar

TitleBelieve-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar
Authors
Issue Date2012
PublisherJohn Benjamins
Citation
Believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar. In Marzo, S ... (Eds.)(et al), Corpus studies in contrastive linguistics, p. 7-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012 How to Cite?
AbstractThe so-called 'raising-to-subject' pattern that verbs of the type believe can occur in is usually treated as the passive alternative for the so-called 'raising-to-object' pattern. In addition to broadening the empirical basis for the opposite claim that the English and Dutch raising-to-subject (or 'nominative and infinitive') patterns have a special functionality which is different from that of the passive construction, this paper specifically examines the stronger proposition that this has always been the case. It empirically investigates whether this proposition holds equally well for English and Dutch through a comparison of the frequencies of believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject patterns in two diachronic corpora. The methodology makes use of Distinctive Collexeme Analysis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146454
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNoel, Den_US
dc.contributor.authorColleman, Ten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-24T07:55:06Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-24T07:55:06Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.citationBelieve-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammar. In Marzo, S ... (Eds.)(et al), Corpus studies in contrastive linguistics, p. 7-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2012en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9789027202628en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/146454-
dc.description.abstractThe so-called 'raising-to-subject' pattern that verbs of the type believe can occur in is usually treated as the passive alternative for the so-called 'raising-to-object' pattern. In addition to broadening the empirical basis for the opposite claim that the English and Dutch raising-to-subject (or 'nominative and infinitive') patterns have a special functionality which is different from that of the passive construction, this paper specifically examines the stronger proposition that this has always been the case. It empirically investigates whether this proposition holds equally well for English and Dutch through a comparison of the frequencies of believe-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject patterns in two diachronic corpora. The methodology makes use of Distinctive Collexeme Analysis.-
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherJohn Benjaminsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCorpus studies in contrastive linguisticsen_US
dc.titleBelieve-type raising-to-object and raising-to-subject verbs in English and Dutch : a contrastive investigation in diachronic construction grammaren_US
dc.typeBook_Chapteren_US
dc.identifier.emailNoel, D: dnoel@hkucc.hku.hken_US
dc.identifier.authorityNoel, D=rp01170en_US
dc.identifier.hkuros199213en_US
dc.identifier.spage7en_US
dc.identifier.epage32en_US
dc.publisher.placeAmsterdamen_US
dc.customcontrol.immutableyiu 130823-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats