File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A comparison of nondeterministic and deterministic switching methods for DC-DC power converters

TitleA comparison of nondeterministic and deterministic switching methods for DC-DC power converters
Authors
KeywordsElectric Potential
Pulse Width Modulation
Random Processes
Issue Date1998
PublisherIEEE
Citation
Ieee Transactions On Power Electronics, 1998, v. 13 n. 6, p. 1046-1055 How to Cite?
AbstractAn analysis and experimental results of the random pulsewidth modulation (RPWM) and random pulse-position modulation (RPPM) methods for dc-dc converters are presented. The characteristics and performance of power converters under two randomized modulations are evaluated. The theoretical relationships of discrete harmonics, continuous noise, and output-voltage ripple of the RPWM and RPPM schemes are established and compared with those of a standard deterministic pulsewidth modulation (PWM) scheme in a buck converter. Limitations in the randomly switched dc-dc converters, which have not been addressed before, are highlighted. Randomized schemes generally have inherent problems in achieving low-output-voltage ripple due to the low-frequency continuous noise within the passband of the converter filter. The inherent low-frequency noise-induced voltage ripple problems of nondeterministic switching methods for dc converters are confirmed experimentally. The performance of the RPPM method is found to be closer to the standard PWM method than that of the RPWM method. For dc-dc power conversion, the RPPM method offers much better output-voltage performance than the RPWM method.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/136867
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.644
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHui, SYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorShrivastava, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSathiakumar, Sen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTse, KKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChung, HSHen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-29T02:13:13Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-29T02:13:13Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_HK
dc.identifier.citationIeee Transactions On Power Electronics, 1998, v. 13 n. 6, p. 1046-1055en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0885-8993en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/136867-
dc.description.abstractAn analysis and experimental results of the random pulsewidth modulation (RPWM) and random pulse-position modulation (RPPM) methods for dc-dc converters are presented. The characteristics and performance of power converters under two randomized modulations are evaluated. The theoretical relationships of discrete harmonics, continuous noise, and output-voltage ripple of the RPWM and RPPM schemes are established and compared with those of a standard deterministic pulsewidth modulation (PWM) scheme in a buck converter. Limitations in the randomly switched dc-dc converters, which have not been addressed before, are highlighted. Randomized schemes generally have inherent problems in achieving low-output-voltage ripple due to the low-frequency continuous noise within the passband of the converter filter. The inherent low-frequency noise-induced voltage ripple problems of nondeterministic switching methods for dc converters are confirmed experimentally. The performance of the RPPM method is found to be closer to the standard PWM method than that of the RPWM method. For dc-dc power conversion, the RPPM method offers much better output-voltage performance than the RPWM method.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIEEE Transactions on Power Electronicsen_HK
dc.subjectElectric Potentialen_US
dc.subjectPulse Width Modulationen_US
dc.subjectRandom Processesen_US
dc.titleA comparison of nondeterministic and deterministic switching methods for DC-DC power convertersen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailHui, SY:ronhui@eee.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHui, SY=rp01510en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/63.728332en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0032205565en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032205565&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume13en_HK
dc.identifier.issue6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1046en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1055en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000076792800007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHui, SY=7202831744en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShrivastava, Y=35249113700en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSathiakumar, S=7004497631en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTse, KK=7102609811en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChung, HSH=7404007467en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0885-8993-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats