File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3109/13651501.2011.572169
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79955783327
- PMID: 22121855
- WOS: WOS:000290270900002
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction and treatment effectiveness during SSRI or duloxetine therapy: 8-week data from a 6-month observational study
Title | Frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction and treatment effectiveness during SSRI or duloxetine therapy: 8-week data from a 6-month observational study | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Keywords | duloxetine Major depressive disorder (MDD) observational study selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) | ||||
Issue Date | 2011 | ||||
Publisher | Informa Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13651501.asp | ||||
Citation | International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 2011, v. 15 n. 2, p. 80-90 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials, the frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at week 8 was lower with duloxetine than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. METHODS: This 6-month, prospective, observational study compared the frequency of TESD (using the Arizona Sexual Experience [ASEX] scale) in MDD patients treated with duloxetine or SSRI monotherapy in the first 8 weeks in normal clinical practice. RESULTS: Physician-assessed TESD frequency at week 8 was comparable with duloxetine and SSRI monotherapy (23.9 and 26.2%, respectively; P = 0.545). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores and remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy (P < 0.001, 0.010, <0.001, and 0.002, respectively), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures (EuroQoL questionnaire-5 dimensions [EQ-5D] and Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] scores: =0.012). Several factors were significantly (P = 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 in this study. CONCLUSIONS: TESD rates with duloxetine and SSRIs at week 8 were comparable, however, significant differences in effectiveness were observed in favour of duloxetine. Antidepressant tolerability with respect to TESD must be managed to maximize remission of depressed patients. | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/135424 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.974 | ||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: Study sponsorship was provided by Eli Lilly and Company. The authors would like to thank Professor Pedro Delgado (Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Texas, Texas, US), Margaret McBride (formerly of Intercontinental Information Services, Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd), Adam Meyers (Eli Lilly and Company) and Jo Wood (Meditech Media Asia Pacifi c Pty Ltd) for assistance with the study design, study description document, data analysis and provision of writing support, respectively. The contributions of all of the investigators, assistants and patients that participated in this study are also gratefully acknowledged. |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dueñas, H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, A | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Brnabic, AJM | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chung, KF | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, CH | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Badr, MG | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Uy-Ponio, T | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ruiz, JR | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Varrey, P | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jian, H | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Dossenbach, M | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-07-27T01:34:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-27T01:34:58Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice, 2011, v. 15 n. 2, p. 80-90 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1365-1501 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/135424 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND: In randomised controlled trials, the frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) at week 8 was lower with duloxetine than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. METHODS: This 6-month, prospective, observational study compared the frequency of TESD (using the Arizona Sexual Experience [ASEX] scale) in MDD patients treated with duloxetine or SSRI monotherapy in the first 8 weeks in normal clinical practice. RESULTS: Physician-assessed TESD frequency at week 8 was comparable with duloxetine and SSRI monotherapy (23.9 and 26.2%, respectively; P = 0.545). Improvements in Clinical Global Impressions of Severity (CGI-S), 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (Self-Report) (QIDS-SR(16)), Integral Inventory for Depression (IID) total scores and remission rates were statistically significantly greater with duloxetine than SSRI monotherapy (P < 0.001, 0.010, <0.001, and 0.002, respectively), but TESD attenuated improvements in quality of life measures (EuroQoL questionnaire-5 dimensions [EQ-5D] and Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS] scores: </=0.012). Several factors were significantly (P </= 0.05) associated with TESD at week 8 in this study. CONCLUSIONS: TESD rates with duloxetine and SSRIs at week 8 were comparable, however, significant differences in effectiveness were observed in favour of duloxetine. Antidepressant tolerability with respect to TESD must be managed to maximize remission of depressed patients. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Informa Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13651501.asp | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice | en_US |
dc.rights | International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice. Copyright © Informa Healthcare. | - |
dc.subject | duloxetine | - |
dc.subject | Major depressive disorder (MDD) | - |
dc.subject | observational study | - |
dc.subject | selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) | - |
dc.subject | treatment emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD) | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects - pharmacology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Depressive Disorder, Major - drug therapy | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Serotonin Uptake Inhibitors - adverse effects - pharmacology | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological - chemically induced | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Thiophenes - adverse effects - pharmacology | - |
dc.title | Frequency of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction and treatment effectiveness during SSRI or duloxetine therapy: 8-week data from a 6-month observational study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Chung, KF: kfchung@hkucc.hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Chung, KF=rp00377 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3109/13651501.2011.572169 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22121855 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79955783327 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 187466 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 80 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 90 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000290270900002 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1365-1501 | - |