File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of bone thickness around the mental foramen for potential fixation of a bone-borne functional appliance: a computer tomography scan study.

TitleEvaluation of bone thickness around the mental foramen for potential fixation of a bone-borne functional appliance: a computer tomography scan study.
Authors
KeywordsBone thickness
Mandible
Mental foramen
Mini-screws
Issue Date2010
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 11, p. 1288-1293 How to Cite?
AbstractA mandible bone-borne Herbst appliance (MBBHA) would avoid the proclination of the lower incisors that occurs with any teeth-borne functional appliance. But mapping of the bone characteristics at potential fixation areas around the mental foramen has not been carried out so far. The aim of this computer tomographic (CT) study was to evaluate bone thickness at specific positions around the mental foramen. CT scans of 60 randomly chosen adult Hong Kong Chinese subjects (mean age 28 ± 6.3 years) were used to measure the bi-cortical bone thickness in the mandible in the mental foramen area. The thickness of buccal and lingual cortical and cancellous bone was assessed at the following locations: 10 mm (A10 mm) and 5 mm (A5 mm) anterior, 10 mm (P10 mm) and 5 mm (P5 mm) posterior, and 5 mm (Inf5 mm) below the mental foramen. The amount of buccal cortical bone thickness ranged between 1.89 mm, 10 mm anterior of the mental foramen, and 2.16 mm, 10 mm posterior to its location. At the A10 mm level, cortical thickness showed a marginal statistically significant difference between A5 and A10 mm. The total amount of bone thickness ranged from 10.19 to 12.06 mm. At the locations studied around the mental foramen, a mean bicortical bone thickness of 10-12 mm was measured. No large variation in the thickness was found between bicortical bone thicknesses in the measured locations around the mental foramen. Thorough evaluation on a case-by-case basis is advisable. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/129058
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
RGC CERG10206968.22311.08003.324.01 (HKU 7623/06M)
University of Hong Kong
Funding Information:

The present study was supported by RGC CERG grant number: 10206968.22311.08003.324.01 (HKU 7623/06M). This article was based on work submitted to The University of Hong Kong for the award of a PhD degree.

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlKalaly, AAen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, RWen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCheung, LKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorPurkayastha, SKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSchätzle, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorRabie, ABen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-23T08:31:59Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-23T08:31:59Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 11, p. 1288-1293en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/129058-
dc.description.abstractA mandible bone-borne Herbst appliance (MBBHA) would avoid the proclination of the lower incisors that occurs with any teeth-borne functional appliance. But mapping of the bone characteristics at potential fixation areas around the mental foramen has not been carried out so far. The aim of this computer tomographic (CT) study was to evaluate bone thickness at specific positions around the mental foramen. CT scans of 60 randomly chosen adult Hong Kong Chinese subjects (mean age 28 ± 6.3 years) were used to measure the bi-cortical bone thickness in the mandible in the mental foramen area. The thickness of buccal and lingual cortical and cancellous bone was assessed at the following locations: 10 mm (A10 mm) and 5 mm (A5 mm) anterior, 10 mm (P10 mm) and 5 mm (P5 mm) posterior, and 5 mm (Inf5 mm) below the mental foramen. The amount of buccal cortical bone thickness ranged between 1.89 mm, 10 mm anterior of the mental foramen, and 2.16 mm, 10 mm posterior to its location. At the A10 mm level, cortical thickness showed a marginal statistically significant difference between A5 and A10 mm. The total amount of bone thickness ranged from 10.19 to 12.06 mm. At the locations studied around the mental foramen, a mean bicortical bone thickness of 10-12 mm was measured. No large variation in the thickness was found between bicortical bone thicknesses in the measured locations around the mental foramen. Thorough evaluation on a case-by-case basis is advisable. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR-
dc.relation.ispartofClinical oral implants researchen_HK
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com-
dc.subjectBone thickness-
dc.subjectMandible-
dc.subjectMental foramen-
dc.subjectMini-screws-
dc.subject.meshBone Density - physiology-
dc.subject.meshMandible - anatomy and histology - radiography-
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Anchorage Procedures - methods-
dc.subject.meshOrthodontic Appliances-
dc.subject.meshTomography, X-Ray Computed-
dc.titleEvaluation of bone thickness around the mental foramen for potential fixation of a bone-borne functional appliance: a computer tomography scan study.en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0905-7161&volume=21&issue=11&spage=1288&epage=1293&date=2010&atitle=Evaluation+of+bone+thickness+around+the+mental+foramen+for+potential+fixation+of+a+bone-borne+functional+appliance:+a+computer+tomography+scan+study-
dc.identifier.emailCheung, LK: lkcheung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailRabie, AB: rabie@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, LK=rp00013en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityRabie, AB=rp00029en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01947.x-
dc.identifier.pmid20546251-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79952279639en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros183270en_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_HK
dc.identifier.issue11en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1288en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1293en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000282688400011-
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAlKalaly, AA=24922819100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, RW=36642905800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, LK=7102302747en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPurkayastha, SK=25931833400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSchätzle, M=6602163648en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRabie, AB=7007172734en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike8018049-
dc.identifier.issnl0905-7161-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats