File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is there any difference in pregnancy and implantation rates when nurses perform embryo transfer in an IVF-ET program?

TitleIs there any difference in pregnancy and implantation rates when nurses perform embryo transfer in an IVF-ET program?
Authors
Cheung, WMNg, EHYLau, EYLYeung, WSBSo, WWKHo, PC
KeywordsEmbryo transfer
In vitro fertilization
Nurses
Results
Issue Date2003
PublisherS Karger AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.karger.com/GOI
Citation
Gynecologic And Obstetric Investigation, 2003, v. 56 n. 1, p. 1-5 How to Cite?
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000072322
AbstractA retrospective analysis of fresh in vitro fertilization treatment cycles and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles from mid-1995 to December 31, 1998, was undertaken. Nurses performed embryo transfer (ET) for government-funded cycles, whereas doctors performed ET for self-funded cycles. During the study period, fresh ET was performed in 1,165 treatment cycles. There were no significant differences in demographic data, ovarian responses and the number of embryos replaced between ET cycles performed by nurses and doctors. Pregnancy rates for ETs performed by nurses and doctors were 16.7 and 15.8% per transfer, respectively, whereas the corresponding implantation rates were 8.3 and 6.9%, respectively. Similar pregnancy and implantation rates were encountered in FET cycles whether ET was performed by nurses or doctors. Copyright © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/87290
ISSN
0378-7346
2021 Impact Factor: 2.729
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.631
ISI Accession Number ID
WOS:000185200000001
References
References in Scopus

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheung, WMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNg, EHYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLau, EYLen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYeung, WSBen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSo, WWKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHo, PCen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T09:27:47Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T09:27:47Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_HK
dc.identifier.citationGynecologic And Obstetric Investigation, 2003, v. 56 n. 1, p. 1-5en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0378-7346en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/87290-
dc.description.abstractA retrospective analysis of fresh in vitro fertilization treatment cycles and frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles from mid-1995 to December 31, 1998, was undertaken. Nurses performed embryo transfer (ET) for government-funded cycles, whereas doctors performed ET for self-funded cycles. During the study period, fresh ET was performed in 1,165 treatment cycles. There were no significant differences in demographic data, ovarian responses and the number of embryos replaced between ET cycles performed by nurses and doctors. Pregnancy rates for ETs performed by nurses and doctors were 16.7 and 15.8% per transfer, respectively, whereas the corresponding implantation rates were 8.3 and 6.9%, respectively. Similar pregnancy and implantation rates were encountered in FET cycles whether ET was performed by nurses or doctors. Copyright © 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherS Karger AG. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.karger.com/GOIen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofGynecologic and Obstetric Investigationen_HK
dc.rightsGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. Copyright © S Karger AG.en_HK
dc.subjectEmbryo transfer-
dc.subjectIn vitro fertilization-
dc.subjectNurses-
dc.subjectResults-
dc.subject.meshAdulten_HK
dc.subject.meshChorionic Gonadotropin - administration & dosageen_HK
dc.subject.meshEmbryo Implantationen_HK
dc.subject.meshEmbryo Transfer - statistics & numerical dataen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshFertilization in Vitroen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMenotropins - administration & dosageen_HK
dc.subject.meshNursesen_HK
dc.subject.meshPregnancyen_HK
dc.subject.meshPregnancy Rateen_HK
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshSperm Injections, Intracytoplasmicen_HK
dc.titleIs there any difference in pregnancy and implantation rates when nurses perform embryo transfer in an IVF-ET program?en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0378-7346&volume=56&spage=1&epage=5&date=2003&atitle=Is+there+any+difference+in+pregnancy+and+implantation+rates+when+nurses+perform+embryo+transfer+in+an+IVF-ET+program?en_HK
dc.identifier.emailNg, EHY:nghye@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailYeung, WSB:wsbyeung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailHo, PC:pcho@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityNg, EHY=rp00426en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYeung, WSB=rp00331en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHo, PC=rp00325en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000072322en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid12867759-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0042424649en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros82862en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0042424649&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume56en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1en_HK
dc.identifier.epage5en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000185200000001-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerlanden_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, WM=36934689500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNg, EHY=35238184300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, EYL=7103086093en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYeung, WSB=7102370745en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSo, WWK=7004974015en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHo, PC=7402211440en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0378-7346-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats

OR

Export to Other Non-XML Formats