File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1186/1471-2164-8-374
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-38049156077
- PMID: 17941982
- WOS: WOS:000252439000001
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Bookmarks:
- CiteULike: 2
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: MetaProm: A neural network based meta-predictor for alternative human promoter prediction
Title | MetaProm: A neural network based meta-predictor for alternative human promoter prediction |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcgenomics/ |
Citation | BMC Genomics, 2007, v. 8 n. 374, p. 1-13 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: De novo eukaryotic promoter prediction is important for discovering novel genes and understanding gene regulation. In spite of the great advances made in the past decade, recent studies revealed that the overall performances of the current promoter prediction programs (PPPs) are still poor, and predictions made by individual PPPs do not overlap each other. Furthermore, most PPPs are trained and tested on the most-upstream promoters; their performances on alternative promoters have not been assessed. Results: In this paper, we evaluate the performances of current major promoter prediction programs (i.e., PSPA, FirstEF, McPromoter, DragonGSF, DragonPF, and FProm) using 42,536 distinct human gene promoters on a genome-wide scale, and with emphasis on alternative promoters. We describe an artificial neural network (ANN) based meta-predictor program that integrates predictions from the current PPPs and the predicted promoters' relation to CpG islands. Our specific analysis of recently discovered alternative promoters reveals that although only 41% of the 3′ most promoters overlap a CpG island, 74% of 5′ most promoters overlap a CpG island. Conclusion: Our assessment of six PPPs on 1.06 × 109 bps of human genome sequence reveals the specific strengths and weaknesses of individual PPPs. Our meta-predictor outperforms any individual PPP in sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we discovered that the 5′ alternative promoters are more likely to be associated with a CpG island. © 2007 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/61601 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.047 |
PubMed Central ID | |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wang, J | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ungar, LH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tseng, H | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hannenhalli, S | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-07-13T03:43:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-07-13T03:43:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | BMC Genomics, 2007, v. 8 n. 374, p. 1-13 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1471-2164 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/61601 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: De novo eukaryotic promoter prediction is important for discovering novel genes and understanding gene regulation. In spite of the great advances made in the past decade, recent studies revealed that the overall performances of the current promoter prediction programs (PPPs) are still poor, and predictions made by individual PPPs do not overlap each other. Furthermore, most PPPs are trained and tested on the most-upstream promoters; their performances on alternative promoters have not been assessed. Results: In this paper, we evaluate the performances of current major promoter prediction programs (i.e., PSPA, FirstEF, McPromoter, DragonGSF, DragonPF, and FProm) using 42,536 distinct human gene promoters on a genome-wide scale, and with emphasis on alternative promoters. We describe an artificial neural network (ANN) based meta-predictor program that integrates predictions from the current PPPs and the predicted promoters' relation to CpG islands. Our specific analysis of recently discovered alternative promoters reveals that although only 41% of the 3′ most promoters overlap a CpG island, 74% of 5′ most promoters overlap a CpG island. Conclusion: Our assessment of six PPPs on 1.06 × 109 bps of human genome sequence reveals the specific strengths and weaknesses of individual PPPs. Our meta-predictor outperforms any individual PPP in sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, we discovered that the 5′ alternative promoters are more likely to be associated with a CpG island. © 2007 Wang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcgenomics/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | BMC Genomics | en_HK |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.rights | BMC Genomics. Copyright © BioMed Central Ltd. | - |
dc.subject.mesh | CpG Islands | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Genome, Human | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Neural Networks (Computer) | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Promoter Regions, Genetic | - |
dc.title | MetaProm: A neural network based meta-predictor for alternative human promoter prediction | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1471-2164&volume=8&issue=374&spage=1&epage=13&date=2007&atitle=MetaProm:+a+neural+network+based+meta-predictor+for+alternative+human+promoter+prediction | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wang, J:junwen@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wang, J=rp00280 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | published_or_final_version | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1186/1471-2164-8-374 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 17941982 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC2194789 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-38049156077 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 156647 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 166789 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 213293 | - |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-38049156077&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 374 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000252439000001 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wang, J=8950599500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ungar, LH=7006123330 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tseng, H=19637691100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hannenhalli, S=6603889650 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 1798440 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1471-2164 | - |