File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Control synthesis versus saturation compensation for systems with rate and amplitude constraints

TitleControl synthesis versus saturation compensation for systems with rate and amplitude constraints
Authors
Issue Date1998
PublisherIEEE.
Citation
American Control Conference, Philadelphia, USA, 24-26 June 1998, v. 3, p. 1473-1477 How to Cite?
AbstractA control synthesis theory was proposed by Horowitz (1984) to design a `three degrees of freedom' controller for rate and amplitude constrained systems. Following anti-reset windup techniques, we (1997) proposed a saturation compensation structure to design compensators for given linear controllers. It is shown that the compensator can be reformulated in terms of the control synthesis theory. Conversely, the `three degrees of freedom' controller is a special case of the compensator construction. From this analysis, shortcomings of the control synthesis theory are exposed and improvements using the compensator structure are discussed and illustrated by an example.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/46637
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHui, Ken_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, CWen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2007-10-30T06:54:47Z-
dc.date.available2007-10-30T06:54:47Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Control Conference, Philadelphia, USA, 24-26 June 1998, v. 3, p. 1473-1477en_HK
dc.identifier.isbn0-7803-4530-4en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/46637-
dc.description.abstractA control synthesis theory was proposed by Horowitz (1984) to design a `three degrees of freedom' controller for rate and amplitude constrained systems. Following anti-reset windup techniques, we (1997) proposed a saturation compensation structure to design compensators for given linear controllers. It is shown that the compensator can be reformulated in terms of the control synthesis theory. Conversely, the `three degrees of freedom' controller is a special case of the compensator construction. From this analysis, shortcomings of the control synthesis theory are exposed and improvements using the compensator structure are discussed and illustrated by an example.en_HK
dc.format.extent485519 bytes-
dc.format.extent5145 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherIEEE.en_HK
dc.rights©1998 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.en_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.titleControl synthesis versus saturation compensation for systems with rate and amplitude constraintsen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0-7803-4530-4&volume=3&spage=1473&epage=1477&date=1998&atitle=Control+synthesis+versus+saturation+compensation+for+systems+with+rate+and+amplitude+constraintsen_HK
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_versionen_HK
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACC.1998.707070en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros31908-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats