File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluation of an Isothermal Amplification HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples as Compared to Clinician-Collected Cervical Samples

TitleEvaluation of an Isothermal Amplification HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples as Compared to Clinician-Collected Cervical Samples
Authors
KeywordsBD Onclarity
cervical cancer screening
Hong Kong
human papilloma virus (HPV)
isothermal amplification
self-sampling
Sentis HPV
Issue Date24-Oct-2023
PublisherMDPI
Citation
Diagnostics, 2023, v. 13, n. 21, p. 3297 How to Cite?
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the concordance of HPV results between the SentisTM HPV assay (Sentis) (BGI Group, Shenzhen, China), an isothermal amplification-based HPV assay, on self-collected and clinician-collected samples and the agreement of Sentis on self-collected samples with the BD OnclarityTM HPV assay (Onclarity) (Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA), a PCR-based HPV assay, on clinician-collected samples. This was a prospective study of 104 women attending the colposcopy clinic for abnormal smears. After informed consent, participants self-collected vaginal samples before having clinician-collected cervical samples. Self-collected samples underwent HPV testing with Sentis (Self-Sentis HPV) and clinician-collected samples were tested with Sentis (Clinician-Sentis HPV) and Onclarity (Clinician-Onclarity), which was used as a reference standard. The concordance was assessed using Cohen's kappa. The prevalence of HPV and the acceptability of self-sampling were also evaluated. The concordance rate between Self-Sentis HPV and Clinician-Sentis HPV was 89.8% with a kappa of 0.769. The concordance rate between Self-Sentis HPV and Clinician-Onclarity was 84.4% with a kappa of 0.643. The prevalence of HPV was 26.0% on Clinician-Onclarity, 29.3% on Clinician-Sentis HPV, and 35.6% on Self-Sentis HPV. Overall, 65% of participants would undergo self-sampling again. This was attributed to mainly not feeling embarrassed (68%) and being convenient (58%). Our study showed a substantial agreement between Self-Sentis HPV with Clinician-Sentis HPV and Clinician-Onclarity. Self-sampling was also shown to be a generally well-accepted method of screening.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340621
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.992
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.622

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChan, Aaron H Y-
dc.contributor.authorNgu, Siew-Fei-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Lesley S K-
dc.contributor.authorTsun, Obe K L-
dc.contributor.authorNgan, Hextan Y S-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Annie N Y-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Karen K L-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:45:57Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:45:57Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-24-
dc.identifier.citationDiagnostics, 2023, v. 13, n. 21, p. 3297-
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340621-
dc.description.abstract<p>This study aimed to evaluate the concordance of HPV results between the SentisTM HPV assay (Sentis) (BGI Group, Shenzhen, China), an isothermal amplification-based HPV assay, on self-collected and clinician-collected samples and the agreement of Sentis on self-collected samples with the BD OnclarityTM HPV assay (Onclarity) (Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA), a PCR-based HPV assay, on clinician-collected samples. This was a prospective study of 104 women attending the colposcopy clinic for abnormal smears. After informed consent, participants self-collected vaginal samples before having clinician-collected cervical samples. Self-collected samples underwent HPV testing with Sentis (Self-Sentis HPV) and clinician-collected samples were tested with Sentis (Clinician-Sentis HPV) and Onclarity (Clinician-Onclarity), which was used as a reference standard. The concordance was assessed using Cohen's kappa. The prevalence of HPV and the acceptability of self-sampling were also evaluated. The concordance rate between Self-Sentis HPV and Clinician-Sentis HPV was 89.8% with a kappa of 0.769. The concordance rate between Self-Sentis HPV and Clinician-Onclarity was 84.4% with a kappa of 0.643. The prevalence of HPV was 26.0% on Clinician-Onclarity, 29.3% on Clinician-Sentis HPV, and 35.6% on Self-Sentis HPV. Overall, 65% of participants would undergo self-sampling again. This was attributed to mainly not feeling embarrassed (68%) and being convenient (58%). Our study showed a substantial agreement between Self-Sentis HPV with Clinician-Sentis HPV and Clinician-Onclarity. Self-sampling was also shown to be a generally well-accepted method of screening.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMDPI-
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnostics-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBD Onclarity-
dc.subjectcervical cancer screening-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.subjecthuman papilloma virus (HPV)-
dc.subjectisothermal amplification-
dc.subjectself-sampling-
dc.subjectSentis HPV-
dc.titleEvaluation of an Isothermal Amplification HPV Assay on Self-Collected Vaginal Samples as Compared to Clinician-Collected Cervical Samples-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics13213297-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85176721511-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue21-
dc.identifier.spage3297-
dc.identifier.eissn2075-4418-
dc.identifier.issnl2075-4418-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats