File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: An in vivo study

TitleClinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: An in vivo study
Authors
KeywordsCarisolv™
Chemomechanical caries removal
Dentinal caries
Diagnodent pen
Er:yag laser
Papacarie®
Primary molars
Issue Date2012
Citation
Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2012, v. 13, n. 1, p. 40-47 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To evaluate four different techniques of caries excavation in primary teeth in terms of efficacy, efficiency and pain experienced during the procedure. Materials and methods: Sample of 120 teeth from children aged 5 to 9 years were equally divided into 4 groups - Air rotor (group A), Carisolv (group B), Papacarie (group C) and Er:YAG laser (group D). Visual and tactile criteria along with DIAGNOdent pen value was used to evaluate efficacy. Time was recorded to determine efficiency and FLACC scale was used to assess the pain experienced. Results: Air rotor and laser were more effective and efficient method whereas laser and CMCR methods were more comfortable methods. Conclusion: Laser irradiation and CMCR methods are comparable to conventional methods in terms of effectiveness and are less painful methods. Clinical significance: Newer techniques of CMCR and laser irradiation of dentinal caries are minimally invasive methods and are less painful and thus should be more frequently employed in pediatric dentistry.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336099

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBohari, Mariya R.-
dc.contributor.authorChunawalla, Yusuf K.-
dc.contributor.authorAhmed, Bijle Mohammed Nadeem-
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-15T08:23:26Z-
dc.date.available2024-01-15T08:23:26Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2012, v. 13, n. 1, p. 40-47-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/336099-
dc.description.abstractAim: To evaluate four different techniques of caries excavation in primary teeth in terms of efficacy, efficiency and pain experienced during the procedure. Materials and methods: Sample of 120 teeth from children aged 5 to 9 years were equally divided into 4 groups - Air rotor (group A), Carisolv (group B), Papacarie (group C) and Er:YAG laser (group D). Visual and tactile criteria along with DIAGNOdent pen value was used to evaluate efficacy. Time was recorded to determine efficiency and FLACC scale was used to assess the pain experienced. Results: Air rotor and laser were more effective and efficient method whereas laser and CMCR methods were more comfortable methods. Conclusion: Laser irradiation and CMCR methods are comparable to conventional methods in terms of effectiveness and are less painful methods. Clinical significance: Newer techniques of CMCR and laser irradiation of dentinal caries are minimally invasive methods and are less painful and thus should be more frequently employed in pediatric dentistry.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Contemporary Dental Practice-
dc.subjectCarisolv™-
dc.subjectChemomechanical caries removal-
dc.subjectDentinal caries-
dc.subjectDiagnodent pen-
dc.subjectEr:yag laser-
dc.subjectPapacarie®-
dc.subjectPrimary molars-
dc.titleClinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: An in vivo study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1093-
dc.identifier.pmid22430692-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84860626811-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage40-
dc.identifier.epage47-
dc.identifier.eissn1526-3711-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats