File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1093
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84860626811
- PMID: 22430692
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: An in vivo study
Title | Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: An in vivo study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Carisolv™ Chemomechanical caries removal Dentinal caries Diagnodent pen Er:yag laser Papacarie® Primary molars |
Issue Date | 2012 |
Citation | Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2012, v. 13, n. 1, p. 40-47 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Aim: To evaluate four different techniques of caries excavation in primary teeth in terms of efficacy, efficiency and pain experienced during the procedure. Materials and methods: Sample of 120 teeth from children aged 5 to 9 years were equally divided into 4 groups - Air rotor (group A), Carisolv (group B), Papacarie (group C) and Er:YAG laser (group D). Visual and tactile criteria along with DIAGNOdent pen value was used to evaluate efficacy. Time was recorded to determine efficiency and FLACC scale was used to assess the pain experienced. Results: Air rotor and laser were more effective and efficient method whereas laser and CMCR methods were more comfortable methods. Conclusion: Laser irradiation and CMCR methods are comparable to conventional methods in terms of effectiveness and are less painful methods. Clinical significance: Newer techniques of CMCR and laser irradiation of dentinal caries are minimally invasive methods and are less painful and thus should be more frequently employed in pediatric dentistry. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/336099 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bohari, Mariya R. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chunawalla, Yusuf K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Bijle Mohammed Nadeem | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-15T08:23:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-15T08:23:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 2012, v. 13, n. 1, p. 40-47 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/336099 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Aim: To evaluate four different techniques of caries excavation in primary teeth in terms of efficacy, efficiency and pain experienced during the procedure. Materials and methods: Sample of 120 teeth from children aged 5 to 9 years were equally divided into 4 groups - Air rotor (group A), Carisolv (group B), Papacarie (group C) and Er:YAG laser (group D). Visual and tactile criteria along with DIAGNOdent pen value was used to evaluate efficacy. Time was recorded to determine efficiency and FLACC scale was used to assess the pain experienced. Results: Air rotor and laser were more effective and efficient method whereas laser and CMCR methods were more comfortable methods. Conclusion: Laser irradiation and CMCR methods are comparable to conventional methods in terms of effectiveness and are less painful methods. Clinical significance: Newer techniques of CMCR and laser irradiation of dentinal caries are minimally invasive methods and are less painful and thus should be more frequently employed in pediatric dentistry. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice | - |
dc.subject | Carisolv™ | - |
dc.subject | Chemomechanical caries removal | - |
dc.subject | Dentinal caries | - |
dc.subject | Diagnodent pen | - |
dc.subject | Er:yag laser | - |
dc.subject | Papacarie® | - |
dc.subject | Primary molars | - |
dc.title | Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using conventional, chemomechanical and laser technique: An in vivo study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1093 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22430692 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84860626811 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 40 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 47 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1526-3711 | - |