File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Expanded Carrier Screening in Chinese Population – A Survey on Views and Acceptance of Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women

TitleExpanded Carrier Screening in Chinese Population – A Survey on Views and Acceptance of Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women
Authors
Keywordsexpanded carrier screening
Chinese
pregnancy
survey
acceptance
Issue Date2020
PublisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/genetics
Citation
Frontiers in Genetics, 2020, v. 11, p. article no. 594091 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: Recessive genetic diseases impose physical and psychological impacts to both newborns and parents who may not be aware of being carriers. Expanded carrier screening (ECS) allows screening for multiple genetic conditions at the same time. Whether or not such non-targeted panethnic approach of genetic carrier screening should replace the conventional targeted approach remains controversial. There is limited data on view and acceptance of ECS in general population, as well as the optimal timing of offering ECS to women. This study assesses views and acceptance of ECS in both pregnant women and non-pregnant women seeking fertility counseling or checkup and their reasons for accepting or declining ECS. Materials and methods: This is a questionnaire survey with ECS information in the form of pamphlets distributed from December 2016 to end of 2018. Women were recruited from the antenatal clinics and the assisted reproductive unit at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital and the prepregnancy counseling clinic at the Family Planning Association of Hong Kong. Results: A total of 923 women were recruited: 623 pregnant women and 300 non-pregnant women. There were significantly more non-pregnant women accepting ECS compared to pregnant women (70.7% vs. 61.2%). Eight hundred and sixty-eight (94%) women perceived ECS as at least as effective as or superior to traditional targeted screening. Significantly more pregnant women have heard about ECS compared with non-pregnant women (42.4% vs. 32.3%, P = 0.0197). Majority of women showed lack of understanding about ECS despite reading pamphlets that were given to them prior to filling in the questionnaires. Cost of ECS was a major reason for declining ECS, 28% (n = 256). Significantly more pregnant women worried about anxiety caused by ECS compared with the non-pregnant group (21.1% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.0006). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that expanded carrier screening was perceived as a better screening by most women. Prepregnancy ECS maybe a better approach than ECS during pregnancy, as it allows more reproductive options and may cause less anxiety. Nevertheless, implementation of universal panethnic ECS will need more patient education, ways to reduce anxiety, and consensus on optimal timing in offering ECS.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/294200
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 4.772
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.413
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCheng, HYH-
dc.contributor.authorWong, GCY-
dc.contributor.authorChan, YKK-
dc.contributor.authorLee, CP-
dc.contributor.authorTang, MHY-
dc.contributor.authorNg, EHY-
dc.contributor.authorKan, ASY-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-23T08:27:51Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-23T08:27:51Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Genetics, 2020, v. 11, p. article no. 594091-
dc.identifier.issn1664-8021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/294200-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Recessive genetic diseases impose physical and psychological impacts to both newborns and parents who may not be aware of being carriers. Expanded carrier screening (ECS) allows screening for multiple genetic conditions at the same time. Whether or not such non-targeted panethnic approach of genetic carrier screening should replace the conventional targeted approach remains controversial. There is limited data on view and acceptance of ECS in general population, as well as the optimal timing of offering ECS to women. This study assesses views and acceptance of ECS in both pregnant women and non-pregnant women seeking fertility counseling or checkup and their reasons for accepting or declining ECS. Materials and methods: This is a questionnaire survey with ECS information in the form of pamphlets distributed from December 2016 to end of 2018. Women were recruited from the antenatal clinics and the assisted reproductive unit at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital and the prepregnancy counseling clinic at the Family Planning Association of Hong Kong. Results: A total of 923 women were recruited: 623 pregnant women and 300 non-pregnant women. There were significantly more non-pregnant women accepting ECS compared to pregnant women (70.7% vs. 61.2%). Eight hundred and sixty-eight (94%) women perceived ECS as at least as effective as or superior to traditional targeted screening. Significantly more pregnant women have heard about ECS compared with non-pregnant women (42.4% vs. 32.3%, P = 0.0197). Majority of women showed lack of understanding about ECS despite reading pamphlets that were given to them prior to filling in the questionnaires. Cost of ECS was a major reason for declining ECS, 28% (n = 256). Significantly more pregnant women worried about anxiety caused by ECS compared with the non-pregnant group (21.1% vs. 7.4%, P = 0.0006). Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that expanded carrier screening was perceived as a better screening by most women. Prepregnancy ECS maybe a better approach than ECS during pregnancy, as it allows more reproductive options and may cause less anxiety. Nevertheless, implementation of universal panethnic ECS will need more patient education, ways to reduce anxiety, and consensus on optimal timing in offering ECS.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.frontiersin.org/genetics-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Genetics-
dc.rightsThis Document is Protected by copyright and was first published by Frontiers. All rights reserved. It is reproduced with permission.-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectexpanded carrier screening-
dc.subjectChinese-
dc.subjectpregnancy-
dc.subjectsurvey-
dc.subjectacceptance-
dc.titleExpanded Carrier Screening in Chinese Population – A Survey on Views and Acceptance of Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCheng, HYH: chy610a@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, YKK: ykchanc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLee, CP: chinpeng@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailTang, MHY: mhytang@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailNg, EHY: nghye@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailKan, ASY: kansya@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, YKK=rp00453-
dc.identifier.authorityLee, CP=rp01862-
dc.identifier.authorityTang, MHY=rp01701-
dc.identifier.authorityNg, EHY=rp00426-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fgene.2020.594091-
dc.identifier.pmid33304390-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC7701308-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85096933927-
dc.identifier.hkuros320105-
dc.identifier.volume11-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 594091-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 594091-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000594654800001-
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland-
dc.identifier.issnl1664-8021-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats