File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Hedging in teacher’s mathematical talk: an L2 classroom case study
Title | Hedging in teacher’s mathematical talk: an L2 classroom case study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2018 |
Publisher | British Association of Applied Linguistics. |
Citation | The 51st Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics, York, UK, 6-8 September 2018 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Underpinned by the concept “Zone of Conjectural Neutrality” (ZCN) (Rowland, 2000), this paper
examines a Mathematics teacher’s use of hedging in reformulating learners’ talk in an L2
classroom. Hedging acknowledges uncertainty in stances. The ZCN is where conjectures can be
challenged and justified openly without risks, paving way for more dialogic interaction. My
paper aims to extend the scholarly conversation on ambiguity (Rowland, 2000; Barwell, 2005)
by arguing that teacher’s strategic use of hedging is conducive to collaborative meaning-making
in L2 Mathematics classrooms. The motivation for learners to articulate mathematical thoughts
in this context merits examination.
Observational data of my study was drawn from nine lessons of a Year 7 English-medium
Mathematics classroom in Hong Kong where learners transit from L1 (Cantonese) primary
education. Coded lesson transcripts show that the teacher tends to hedge when she represents
learners’ responses, in phrases such as “Chris suggested/said that…”. The act of
hedging appears paradoxical to the pursuit of precision in mathematics. Ambiguity is implied,
given that the teacher does not explicitly tell whether students’ responses are valid on the spot.
She takes the opportunity to reformulate learners’ responses for clarity and completeness.
Notwithstanding this presumption, the classroom data illustrates that a ZCN - featuring the
teacher’s hedging - encourages learners’ self-initiated responses and request for clarification.
Learners also get credit for contributing their ideas. Triangulation with the teacher and student
interview data reveals that reciprocal classroom interaction helps learners overcome linguistic
and conceptual barriers. This study sheds light on how hedging in L2 Mathematics classrooms
can cultivate an inclusive and non-threatening learning space for knowledge co-construction. It
provides implications on student voice empowerment.
References
Barwell, R. (2005). Ambiguity in the mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 19(2),
117-125.
Rowland, T. (2000). The pragmatics of mathematics education: Vagueness in mathematical
discourse. London: Falmer Press. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/259817 |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Poon, S | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-09-03T04:14:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-09-03T04:14:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | The 51st Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics, York, UK, 6-8 September 2018 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/259817 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Underpinned by the concept “Zone of Conjectural Neutrality” (ZCN) (Rowland, 2000), this paper examines a Mathematics teacher’s use of hedging in reformulating learners’ talk in an L2 classroom. Hedging acknowledges uncertainty in stances. The ZCN is where conjectures can be challenged and justified openly without risks, paving way for more dialogic interaction. My paper aims to extend the scholarly conversation on ambiguity (Rowland, 2000; Barwell, 2005) by arguing that teacher’s strategic use of hedging is conducive to collaborative meaning-making in L2 Mathematics classrooms. The motivation for learners to articulate mathematical thoughts in this context merits examination. Observational data of my study was drawn from nine lessons of a Year 7 English-medium Mathematics classroom in Hong Kong where learners transit from L1 (Cantonese) primary education. Coded lesson transcripts show that the teacher tends to hedge when she represents learners’ responses, in phrases such as “Chris suggested/said that…”. The act of hedging appears paradoxical to the pursuit of precision in mathematics. Ambiguity is implied, given that the teacher does not explicitly tell whether students’ responses are valid on the spot. She takes the opportunity to reformulate learners’ responses for clarity and completeness. Notwithstanding this presumption, the classroom data illustrates that a ZCN - featuring the teacher’s hedging - encourages learners’ self-initiated responses and request for clarification. Learners also get credit for contributing their ideas. Triangulation with the teacher and student interview data reveals that reciprocal classroom interaction helps learners overcome linguistic and conceptual barriers. This study sheds light on how hedging in L2 Mathematics classrooms can cultivate an inclusive and non-threatening learning space for knowledge co-construction. It provides implications on student voice empowerment. References Barwell, R. (2005). Ambiguity in the mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 19(2), 117-125. Rowland, T. (2000). The pragmatics of mathematics education: Vagueness in mathematical discourse. London: Falmer Press. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | British Association of Applied Linguistics. | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Annual Meeting of the British Association of Applied Linguistics | - |
dc.title | Hedging in teacher’s mathematical talk: an L2 classroom case study | - |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | - |
dc.identifier.email | Poon, S: spoonws@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Poon, S=rp02332 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 289097 | - |
dc.publisher.place | York, UK | - |