File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: The Role of Media in Antitrust: Evidence from China

TitleThe Role of Media in Antitrust: Evidence from China
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherFordham University, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://fordhamilj.org/
Citation
Fordham International Law Journal, 2018, v. 41 n. 2, p. 473-530 How to Cite?
AbstractThis Article examines the media, a neglected but important institution that plays a role in influencing Chinese antitrust enforcement. Drawing from the methodology used in communication studies, the Article conducted a content analysis of 1,394 news reports on six high-profile Chinese antitrust investigations from 2008 to 2015. The findings demonstrate that in reporting antitrust investigations, Chinese media tends to be biased against firms under investigation. Instead of providing a balanced and objective account of the story, the media was an effective conduit for amplifying the populist concern, and aided and abetted the regulator in advancing its enforcement. The Article argues that such an outcome is driven by at least three factors: the regulator’s strategic leakage of information to state-controlled media, the rarity of public dissents of agency decisions, and the populist pressures for lower prices and nationalism.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251573
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, HA-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-06T01:38:10Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-06T01:38:10Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationFordham International Law Journal, 2018, v. 41 n. 2, p. 473-530-
dc.identifier.issn0747-9395-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/251573-
dc.description.abstractThis Article examines the media, a neglected but important institution that plays a role in influencing Chinese antitrust enforcement. Drawing from the methodology used in communication studies, the Article conducted a content analysis of 1,394 news reports on six high-profile Chinese antitrust investigations from 2008 to 2015. The findings demonstrate that in reporting antitrust investigations, Chinese media tends to be biased against firms under investigation. Instead of providing a balanced and objective account of the story, the media was an effective conduit for amplifying the populist concern, and aided and abetted the regulator in advancing its enforcement. The Article argues that such an outcome is driven by at least three factors: the regulator’s strategic leakage of information to state-controlled media, the rarity of public dissents of agency decisions, and the populist pressures for lower prices and nationalism.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFordham University, School of Law. The Journal's web site is located at http://fordhamilj.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofFordham International Law Journal-
dc.titleThe Role of Media in Antitrust: Evidence from China-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailZhang, HA: angelaz@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityZhang, HA=rp02279-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.hkuros287424-
dc.identifier.volume41-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage473-
dc.identifier.epage530-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.issnl0747-9395-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats