File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of Multifactorial Treatment Targets and Relative Importance of Hemoglobin A1c, Blood Pressure, and Low‐Density Lipoprotein‐Cholesterol on Cardiovascular Diseases in Chinese Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study

TitleEffect of Multifactorial Treatment Targets and Relative Importance of Hemoglobin A1c, Blood Pressure, and Low‐Density Lipoprotein‐Cholesterol on Cardiovascular Diseases in Chinese Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study
Authors
KeywordsBlood pressure
Cardiovascular disease
Diabetes mellitus
Hemoglobin A1c
Lipids
Issue Date2017
PublisherWiley Open Access. The Journal's web site is located at http://jaha.ahajournals.org/
Citation
Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017, v. 6 n. 8, article no. e006400, p. 1-13 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The relative effect of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐C) (“ABC” factors) on the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association of key clinical parameters on CVD risk using a multifactorial optimal control approach in Chinese primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results: A population‐based retrospective cohort study was conducted on 144 271 Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus primary care patients, aged 18 to 79 and without prior clinical diagnosis of CVD in 2008–2011. Cox regressions were conducted to examine the association between the combinations of ABC targets (hemoglobin A1c <7%, blood pressure <130/90 mm Hg, and LDL‐C <2.6 mmol/L) and risks of CVD (overall), coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Achieving more ABC targets incrementally reduced the incidence of total CVD and individual disease including coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure, irrespective of other patient characteristics. Compared with suboptimal control in all ABC levels, achieving any 1, 2, and all 3 ABC targets reduced the relative risk of CVD by 13% to 42%, 31% to 52%, and 55%, respectively. Among those achieving only 1 ABC target, LDL‐C reduction was associated with the greatest CVD risk reduction (42%), followed by blood pressure reduction (18%), and hemoglobin A1c reduction (13%). Conclusions: To achieve the greatest risk reduction for the incidence of CVD, the ultimate goal of treatment should be to achieve target control of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and LDL‐C. If it is not possible to achieve all 3 targets, efforts should be prioritized on treating the LDL‐C to minimize CVD risk.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/247503
ISSN
2017 Impact Factor: 4.45
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.484
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWan, YF-
dc.contributor.authorFung, SCC-
dc.contributor.authorYu, YTE-
dc.contributor.authorChin, WY-
dc.contributor.authorFong, DYT-
dc.contributor.authorChan, KC-
dc.contributor.authorLam, CLK-
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-18T08:28:17Z-
dc.date.available2017-10-18T08:28:17Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Heart Association, 2017, v. 6 n. 8, article no. e006400, p. 1-13-
dc.identifier.issn2047-9980-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/247503-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The relative effect of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐C) (“ABC” factors) on the prevention of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the association of key clinical parameters on CVD risk using a multifactorial optimal control approach in Chinese primary care patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results: A population‐based retrospective cohort study was conducted on 144 271 Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus primary care patients, aged 18 to 79 and without prior clinical diagnosis of CVD in 2008–2011. Cox regressions were conducted to examine the association between the combinations of ABC targets (hemoglobin A1c <7%, blood pressure <130/90 mm Hg, and LDL‐C <2.6 mmol/L) and risks of CVD (overall), coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure. Achieving more ABC targets incrementally reduced the incidence of total CVD and individual disease including coronary heart disease, stroke, and heart failure, irrespective of other patient characteristics. Compared with suboptimal control in all ABC levels, achieving any 1, 2, and all 3 ABC targets reduced the relative risk of CVD by 13% to 42%, 31% to 52%, and 55%, respectively. Among those achieving only 1 ABC target, LDL‐C reduction was associated with the greatest CVD risk reduction (42%), followed by blood pressure reduction (18%), and hemoglobin A1c reduction (13%). Conclusions: To achieve the greatest risk reduction for the incidence of CVD, the ultimate goal of treatment should be to achieve target control of hemoglobin A1c, blood pressure, and LDL‐C. If it is not possible to achieve all 3 targets, efforts should be prioritized on treating the LDL‐C to minimize CVD risk.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley Open Access. The Journal's web site is located at http://jaha.ahajournals.org/-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Heart Association-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectBlood pressure-
dc.subjectCardiovascular disease-
dc.subjectDiabetes mellitus-
dc.subjectHemoglobin A1c-
dc.subjectLipids-
dc.titleEffect of Multifactorial Treatment Targets and Relative Importance of Hemoglobin A1c, Blood Pressure, and Low‐Density Lipoprotein‐Cholesterol on Cardiovascular Diseases in Chinese Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Population‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailWan, YF: yfwan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFung, SCC: cfsc@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailYu, YTE: ytyu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChin, WY: chinwy@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailFong, DYT: dytfong@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChan, KC: kcchanae@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, CLK: clklam@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityWan, YF=rp02518-
dc.identifier.authorityFung, SCC=rp01330-
dc.identifier.authorityYu, YTE=rp01693-
dc.identifier.authorityChin, WY=rp00290-
dc.identifier.authorityFong, DYT=rp00253-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, CLK=rp00350-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/JAHA.117.006400-
dc.identifier.pmid28862945-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC5586469-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85030679611-
dc.identifier.hkuros281361-
dc.identifier.volume6-
dc.identifier.issue8-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e006400, p. 1-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e006400, p. 13-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000427296800024-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats