File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Cemented or uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement? A review from a clinical and radiological perspective.

TitleCemented or uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement? A review from a clinical and radiological perspective.
Authors
Issue Date2005
PublisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.josonline.org/
Citation
Journal Of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong), 2005, v. 13 n. 1, p. 96-105 How to Cite?
AbstractControversy exists regarding the optimal method of fixation for primary total hip replacement, particularly the femoral component. We performed a systematic literature review to explore whether cemented total hip replacement can achieve better clinical and radiological outcomes. A total of 29 publications were selected using computer-aided and manual searches. A qualitative comparison of results in clinical and radiological changes was then conducted. Most of the literature showed that better short-term clinical and functional outcomes could be obtained from cemented femoral fixation than from uncemented femoral fixation. Results were less clear for the mid-term clinical outcome, though in general, cemented fixation still appeared to show a superior clinical outcome. Radiographic differences are variable and do not seem to correlate with clinical findings. For the short- and mid-term, cemented femoral component is recommended. However, a long-term randomised trial combined with a large cohort study or registry is needed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/170075
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.542
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.458

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNi, GXen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLu, WWen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChiu, KYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorFong, DYen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-30T06:05:10Z-
dc.date.available2012-10-30T06:05:10Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Orthopaedic Surgery (Hong Kong), 2005, v. 13 n. 1, p. 96-105en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1022-5536en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/170075-
dc.description.abstractControversy exists regarding the optimal method of fixation for primary total hip replacement, particularly the femoral component. We performed a systematic literature review to explore whether cemented total hip replacement can achieve better clinical and radiological outcomes. A total of 29 publications were selected using computer-aided and manual searches. A qualitative comparison of results in clinical and radiological changes was then conducted. Most of the literature showed that better short-term clinical and functional outcomes could be obtained from cemented femoral fixation than from uncemented femoral fixation. Results were less clear for the mid-term clinical outcome, though in general, cemented fixation still appeared to show a superior clinical outcome. Radiographic differences are variable and do not seem to correlate with clinical findings. For the short- and mid-term, cemented femoral component is recommended. However, a long-term randomised trial combined with a large cohort study or registry is needed.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherHong Kong Academy of Medicine Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.josonline.org/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of orthopaedic surgery (Hong Kong)en_HK
dc.subject.meshArthroplasty, Replacement, Hip - Instrumentationen_US
dc.subject.meshBone Cementsen_US
dc.subject.meshHip Joint - Radiography - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshHip Prosthesisen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshJoint Diseases - Radiography - Surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshRecovery Of Functionen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_US
dc.titleCemented or uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement? A review from a clinical and radiological perspective.en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLu, WW: wwlu@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailChiu, KY: pkychiu@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailFong, DY: dytfong@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLu, WW=rp00411en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, KY=rp00379en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityFong, DY=rp00253en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.pmid15872411-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-27244459975en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros98013-
dc.identifier.volume13en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage96en_HK
dc.identifier.epage105en_HK
dc.publisher.placeHong Kongen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNi, GX=8303037400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLu, WW=7404215221en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChiu, KY=7202988127en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFong, DY=35261710300en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats