File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90568-6
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0022252238
- PMID: 3898832
- WOS: WOS:A1985ARC1800005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Efficacy of sucralfate in corpus, prepyloric, and duodenal ulcer-associated gastric ulcers. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Title | Efficacy of sucralfate in corpus, prepyloric, and duodenal ulcer-associated gastric ulcers. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1985 |
Publisher | Excerpta Medica, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/amj |
Citation | American Journal Of Medicine, 1985, v. 79 n. 2 C, p. 24-31 How to Cite? |
Abstract | A 12-week study with two weekly endoscopic assessments was performed in 138 patients to compare the efficacy of sucralfate fine granules (900 mg one-half hour before breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and at bedtime) versus placebo in the healing of gastric ulcers prestratified into corpus, prepyloric, and duodenal ulcer-associated. For corpus and prepyloric ulcers, the respective healing rates achieved by sucralfate at six weeks (69 and 80 percent) and at eight weeks (80 and 93 percent) were significantly (p < 0.005) better than those obtained with placebo (33 and 25 percent at six weeks, and 41 and 33 percent at eight weeks). The design of the study permitted life-table analysis that further demonstrated the efficacy of sucralfate in these two ulcer types (p < 0.0001). Symptomatic response was likewise significantly better than with placebo. Similar healing rates and symptomatic responses were observed for patients with duodenal ulcer-associated gastric ulcer but were not significantly better with sucralfate than with placebo. From 38 prospectively obtained clinical, personal, physiological, and endoscopic characteristics, it was found that ulcer size and a history of pain had significant influence on healing with sucralfate. It is concluded that sucralfate is safe and effective for the treatment of corpus and prepyloric ulcers. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161691 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 5.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.063 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lam, SK | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, WY | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, CL | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-09-05T05:14:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-09-05T05:14:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1985 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | American Journal Of Medicine, 1985, v. 79 n. 2 C, p. 24-31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0002-9343 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/161691 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A 12-week study with two weekly endoscopic assessments was performed in 138 patients to compare the efficacy of sucralfate fine granules (900 mg one-half hour before breakfast, lunch, and dinner, and at bedtime) versus placebo in the healing of gastric ulcers prestratified into corpus, prepyloric, and duodenal ulcer-associated. For corpus and prepyloric ulcers, the respective healing rates achieved by sucralfate at six weeks (69 and 80 percent) and at eight weeks (80 and 93 percent) were significantly (p < 0.005) better than those obtained with placebo (33 and 25 percent at six weeks, and 41 and 33 percent at eight weeks). The design of the study permitted life-table analysis that further demonstrated the efficacy of sucralfate in these two ulcer types (p < 0.0001). Symptomatic response was likewise significantly better than with placebo. Similar healing rates and symptomatic responses were observed for patients with duodenal ulcer-associated gastric ulcer but were not significantly better with sucralfate than with placebo. From 38 prospectively obtained clinical, personal, physiological, and endoscopic characteristics, it was found that ulcer size and a history of pain had significant influence on healing with sucralfate. It is concluded that sucralfate is safe and effective for the treatment of corpus and prepyloric ulcers. | en_US |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Excerpta Medica, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/amj | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | American Journal of Medicine | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Actuarial Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aluminum - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Anti-Ulcer Agents - Therapeutic Use | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Clinical Trials As Topic | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Duodenal Ulcer - Complications | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Gastroscopy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Compliance | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Placebos | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Random Allocation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Stomach Ulcer - Complications - Drug Therapy - Pathology | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sucralfate | en_US |
dc.title | Efficacy of sucralfate in corpus, prepyloric, and duodenal ulcer-associated gastric ulcers. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.email | Lai, CL:hrmelcl@hku.hk | en_US |
dc.identifier.authority | Lai, CL=rp00314 | en_US |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90568-6 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 3898832 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0022252238 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 79 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 C | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 24 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 31 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1985ARC1800005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, SK=7402279473 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, WY=7402933199 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lai, CL=7403086396 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0002-9343 | - |