File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: A natural language processing approach to automatic plagiarism detection

TitleA natural language processing approach to automatic plagiarism detection
Authors
KeywordsNatural language process
Plagiarism detection
Syntactic and semantic analysis
Issue Date2007
Citation
Sigite'07 - Proceedings Of The 2007 Acm Information Technology Education Conference, 2007, p. 213-218 How to Cite?
AbstractThe problem of plagiarism has existed for a long time but with the advance of information technology the problem becomes worse. It is because there are many electronic versions of published materials available to everyone. The Web is an important and common source for plagiarism. Some plagiarism detection programs (such as Turnitin) were developed to attempt to deal with this problem. To determine whether an article is copied from the Web or other electronic sources, the plagiarism detection program should calculate the similarity between two articles. However, it is often difficult to detect plagiarism accurately after modification of the copied contents. For example, it is possible to simply replace a word with its synonym (e.g. "program" - "software ") and change the entire sentence structure. Most plagiarism detection programs can only compare whether two words are the same lexically and count how many matched words are there in a paper. Thus, if the copied materials are modified deliberately, it becomes difficult to detect plagiarism. Application of natural language processing can help to resolve this kind of problem. The underlying syntactic structure and semantic meaning of two sentences can be compared to reveal their similarity. There are several steps in the matching procedure. First, the thesaurus (or the lexical hierarchical structure) is referenced to find out the synonyms, broader terms and narrower terms used in the paper being checked. Then, the paper will be compared with the documents in the database. Wordnet is a typical example of the thesaurus that can be used for this purpose. If it is suspected that the paper contains some contents from the database, the sentences of the paper may be parsed to construct their parsing trees and semantic representations for further detailed comparison. The context free grammar and the case grammar are used to represent the syntactic structure and semantic meaning of sentences in the system. It is found that plagiarism that cannot be detected by the traditional methods can be identified by this new approach. Copyright 2007 ACM.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/134693
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, CHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, YYen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-05T08:24:35Z-
dc.date.available2011-07-05T08:24:35Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationSigite'07 - Proceedings Of The 2007 Acm Information Technology Education Conference, 2007, p. 213-218en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/134693-
dc.description.abstractThe problem of plagiarism has existed for a long time but with the advance of information technology the problem becomes worse. It is because there are many electronic versions of published materials available to everyone. The Web is an important and common source for plagiarism. Some plagiarism detection programs (such as Turnitin) were developed to attempt to deal with this problem. To determine whether an article is copied from the Web or other electronic sources, the plagiarism detection program should calculate the similarity between two articles. However, it is often difficult to detect plagiarism accurately after modification of the copied contents. For example, it is possible to simply replace a word with its synonym (e.g. "program" - "software ") and change the entire sentence structure. Most plagiarism detection programs can only compare whether two words are the same lexically and count how many matched words are there in a paper. Thus, if the copied materials are modified deliberately, it becomes difficult to detect plagiarism. Application of natural language processing can help to resolve this kind of problem. The underlying syntactic structure and semantic meaning of two sentences can be compared to reveal their similarity. There are several steps in the matching procedure. First, the thesaurus (or the lexical hierarchical structure) is referenced to find out the synonyms, broader terms and narrower terms used in the paper being checked. Then, the paper will be compared with the documents in the database. Wordnet is a typical example of the thesaurus that can be used for this purpose. If it is suspected that the paper contains some contents from the database, the sentences of the paper may be parsed to construct their parsing trees and semantic representations for further detailed comparison. The context free grammar and the case grammar are used to represent the syntactic structure and semantic meaning of sentences in the system. It is found that plagiarism that cannot be detected by the traditional methods can be identified by this new approach. Copyright 2007 ACM.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSIGITE'07 - Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Information Technology Education Conferenceen_HK
dc.subjectNatural language processen_HK
dc.subjectPlagiarism detectionen_HK
dc.subjectSyntactic and semantic analysisen_HK
dc.titleA natural language processing approach to automatic plagiarism detectionen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailChan, YY: yychan8@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityChan, YY=rp00894en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/1324302.1324348en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-62949198590en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-62949198590&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.spage213en_HK
dc.identifier.epage218en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLeung, CH=7402612553en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, YY=7403676264en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats