File Download
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02636.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-77955821321
- PMID: 20560941
- WOS: WOS:000280989000003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomised controlled noninferiority trial
Title | Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomised controlled noninferiority trial | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Keywords | Factorial design medical abortion mifepristone misoprostol dose and route | ||||
Issue Date | 2010 | ||||
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOG | ||||
Citation | Bjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2010, v. 117 n. 10, p. 1186-1196 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | Objective To compare 400 and 800 g sublingual or vaginal misoprostol 24 hours after 200 mg mifepristone for noninferiority regarding efficacy in achieving complete abortion for pregnancy termination up to 63 days of gestation. Design Placebo-controlled, randomised, noninferiority factorial trial, stratified by centre and length of gestation. Misoprostol 400 or 800 g, administered either sublingually or vaginally, with follow up after 2 and 6 weeks. Setting Fifteen obstetricsgynaecology departments in ten countries. Population Pregnant women (n = 3005) up to 63 days of gestation requesting medical abortion. Methods Two-sided 95% CI for differences in failure of complete abortion and continuing pregnancy, with a 3% noninferiority margin, were calculated. Proportions of women with adverse effects were recorded. Outcome measures Complete abortion without surgical intervention (main); continuing live pregnancies, induction-to-abortion interval, adverse effects, women's perceptions (secondary). Results Efficacy outcomes analysed for 2962 women (98.6%): 90.5% had complete abortion after 400 g misoprostol, 94.2% after 800 g. Noninferiority of 400 g misoprostol was not demonstrated for failure of complete abortion (difference: 3.7%; 95% CI 1.8-5.6%). The 400-g dose showed higher risk of incomplete abortion (P < 0.01) and continuing pregnancy (P < 0.01) than 800 g. Vaginal and sublingual routes had similar risks of failure to achieve complete abortion (P = 0.47, difference in sublingual minus vaginal -0.7%, 95% CI -2.6-1.2%). A similar pattern was observed for continuing pregnancies (P = 0.21). Fewer women reported adverse effects with vaginal than sublingual administration and with the 400-g dose than the 800-g dose. Of the women, 94% were satisfied or highly satisfied with the regimens, 53% preferred the sublingual route and 47% preferred the vaginal route. Conclusions A 400-g dose of misoprostol should not replace the 800-g dose when administered 24 hours after 200 mg mifepristone for inducing abortion in pregnancies up to 63 days. Sublingual and vaginal misoprostol have similar efficacy, but vaginal administration is associated with a lower frequency of adverse effects. © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134487 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.858 | ||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: The study was funded by the UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction. We thank the members of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board for their contribution to interim analyses and their valuable comments on the manuscript. | ||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Von Hertzen, H | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Huong, NTM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Piaggio, G | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Bayalag, M | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cabezas, E | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Fang, AH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | GemzellDanielsson, K | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hinh, ND | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Mittal, S | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ng, EHY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chaturachinda, K | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Pinter, B | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Puscasiu, L | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Savardekar, L | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Shenoy, S | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Khomassuridge, A | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tuyet, HTD | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Velasco, A | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Peregoudov, A | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-17T09:21:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-17T09:21:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Bjog: An International Journal Of Obstetrics And Gynaecology, 2010, v. 117 n. 10, p. 1186-1196 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1470-0328 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/134487 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective To compare 400 and 800 g sublingual or vaginal misoprostol 24 hours after 200 mg mifepristone for noninferiority regarding efficacy in achieving complete abortion for pregnancy termination up to 63 days of gestation. Design Placebo-controlled, randomised, noninferiority factorial trial, stratified by centre and length of gestation. Misoprostol 400 or 800 g, administered either sublingually or vaginally, with follow up after 2 and 6 weeks. Setting Fifteen obstetricsgynaecology departments in ten countries. Population Pregnant women (n = 3005) up to 63 days of gestation requesting medical abortion. Methods Two-sided 95% CI for differences in failure of complete abortion and continuing pregnancy, with a 3% noninferiority margin, were calculated. Proportions of women with adverse effects were recorded. Outcome measures Complete abortion without surgical intervention (main); continuing live pregnancies, induction-to-abortion interval, adverse effects, women's perceptions (secondary). Results Efficacy outcomes analysed for 2962 women (98.6%): 90.5% had complete abortion after 400 g misoprostol, 94.2% after 800 g. Noninferiority of 400 g misoprostol was not demonstrated for failure of complete abortion (difference: 3.7%; 95% CI 1.8-5.6%). The 400-g dose showed higher risk of incomplete abortion (P < 0.01) and continuing pregnancy (P < 0.01) than 800 g. Vaginal and sublingual routes had similar risks of failure to achieve complete abortion (P = 0.47, difference in sublingual minus vaginal -0.7%, 95% CI -2.6-1.2%). A similar pattern was observed for continuing pregnancies (P = 0.21). Fewer women reported adverse effects with vaginal than sublingual administration and with the 400-g dose than the 800-g dose. Of the women, 94% were satisfied or highly satisfied with the regimens, 53% preferred the sublingual route and 47% preferred the vaginal route. Conclusions A 400-g dose of misoprostol should not replace the 800-g dose when administered 24 hours after 200 mg mifepristone for inducing abortion in pregnancies up to 63 days. Sublingual and vaginal misoprostol have similar efficacy, but vaginal administration is associated with a lower frequency of adverse effects. © RCOG 2010 BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/BJOG | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | en_HK |
dc.rights | The definitive version is available at www3.interscience.wiley.com | - |
dc.subject | Factorial design | en_HK |
dc.subject | medical abortion | en_HK |
dc.subject | mifepristone | en_HK |
dc.subject | misoprostol dose and route | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal - administration and dosage | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Abortifacient Agents, Steroidal - administration and dosage | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Abortion, Induced - methods | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Mifepristone - administration and dosage | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Misoprostol - administration and dosage | - |
dc.title | Misoprostol dose and route after mifepristone for early medical abortion: A randomised controlled noninferiority trial | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1470-0328&volume=117&issue=10&spage=1186&epage=1196&date=2010&atitle=Misoprostol+dose+and+route+after+mifepristone+for+early+medical+abortion:+a+randomised+controlled+noninferiority+trial | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, EHY:nghye@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, EHY=rp00426 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_OA_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02636.x | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20560941 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-77955821321 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 185499 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-77955821321&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 117 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 1186 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 1196 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000280989000003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Von Hertzen, H=7004390324 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Huong, NTM=24472793300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Piaggio, G=7005979371 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Bayalag, M=36631589000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cabezas, E=8160947400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fang, AH=35313320200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | GemzellDanielsson, K=7003551602 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hinh, ND=8870066500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Mittal, S=16444643600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, EHY=35238184300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chaturachinda, K=7005924863 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pinter, B=6603669746 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Puscasiu, L=25929536400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Savardekar, L=23969557900 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Shenoy, S=7103214726 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Khomassuridge, A=36632236600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tuyet, HTD=16445227000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Velasco, A=16418099400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Peregoudov, A=6603256918 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 7782666 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1470-0328 | - |