File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3109/17549507.2011.534176
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-79954492395
- PMID: 21480810
- WOS: WOS:000288628200004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Aerodynamic characteristics associated with oesophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese
Title | Aerodynamic characteristics associated with oesophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Cantonese Laryngectomy oesophageal tracheoesophageal |
Issue Date | 2011 |
Publisher | Informa. The Journal's web site is located at http://informahealthcare.com/loi/asl |
Citation | International Journal Of Speech-Language Pathology, 2011, v. 13 n. 2, p. 137-144 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The present study investigated the aerodynamic differences between standard oesophageal (SE) and tracheoesophageal (TE) speech. Airflow and air pressure values below the pharyngoesophageal segment were obtained from 10 SE and 12 TE superior speakers of Cantonese. Airflow data were directly measured from sustained vowels, and sub-pharyngoesophageal segment pressure was estimated from /ip hip hi/ syllables produced by the alaryngeal speakers. Results indicated that SE speech was associated with a lower rate of airflow and a higher pressure below the pharyngoesophageal segment than TE speech. SE and TE speakers exhibited an average airflow and sub-pharyngoesophageal segment pressure values of 70.50 mL/s and 134.15 mL/s, and 25.13 cm H 2O and 22.61 cm H 2O, respectively. Using the airflow and sub-pharyngoesophageal segment pressure, neoglottal resistance values were derived. The estimated neoglottal resistance was greater in SE speakers than in TE speakers. It is speculated that such difference in neoglottal resistance may be related to the use of different air reservoir mechanisms between SE and TE speakers. Such information will help speech-language pathologists design better speech therapy regimes for SE and TE speakers by understanding more about the difference between SE and TE phonation. © 2011 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/133651 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.526 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, ML | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-05-24T02:13:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-05-24T02:13:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal Of Speech-Language Pathology, 2011, v. 13 n. 2, p. 137-144 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1754-9515 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/133651 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The present study investigated the aerodynamic differences between standard oesophageal (SE) and tracheoesophageal (TE) speech. Airflow and air pressure values below the pharyngoesophageal segment were obtained from 10 SE and 12 TE superior speakers of Cantonese. Airflow data were directly measured from sustained vowels, and sub-pharyngoesophageal segment pressure was estimated from /ip hip hi/ syllables produced by the alaryngeal speakers. Results indicated that SE speech was associated with a lower rate of airflow and a higher pressure below the pharyngoesophageal segment than TE speech. SE and TE speakers exhibited an average airflow and sub-pharyngoesophageal segment pressure values of 70.50 mL/s and 134.15 mL/s, and 25.13 cm H 2O and 22.61 cm H 2O, respectively. Using the airflow and sub-pharyngoesophageal segment pressure, neoglottal resistance values were derived. The estimated neoglottal resistance was greater in SE speakers than in TE speakers. It is speculated that such difference in neoglottal resistance may be related to the use of different air reservoir mechanisms between SE and TE speakers. Such information will help speech-language pathologists design better speech therapy regimes for SE and TE speakers by understanding more about the difference between SE and TE phonation. © 2011 The Speech Pathology Association of Australia Limited. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Informa. The Journal's web site is located at http://informahealthcare.com/loi/asl | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology | en_HK |
dc.subject | Cantonese | en_HK |
dc.subject | Laryngectomy | en_HK |
dc.subject | oesophageal | en_HK |
dc.subject | tracheoesophageal | en_HK |
dc.title | Aerodynamic characteristics associated with oesophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, ML: manwa@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, ML=rp00942 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3109/17549507.2011.534176 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 21480810 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-79954492395 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 185208 | en_US |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-79954492395&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 13 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 137 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 144 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1754-9515 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000288628200004 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ng, ML=15923631600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1754-9507 | - |