File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Providing productive feedback

TitleProviding productive feedback
Authors
Issue Date1990
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/
Citation
Elt Journal, 1990, v. 44 n. 4, p. 279-285 How to Cite?
AbstractMany teachers find marking to be a tedious and unrewarding chore. While it is a crucial aspect of the classroom writing process, our diligent attention and careful comments only rarely seem to bring about improvements in subsequent work. To ensure that marking becomes an effective tool in our teaching programmes, then, we must persuade students to act on the feedback we provide. The alternative feedback methods suggested here offer explicit information about teacher expectations and encourage students to go back and reassess their work. 'Minimal marking' and taped commentary can therefore be considered as 'interactive' feedback styles. © 1990 Oxford University Press.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/130175
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.864
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.260

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHyland, Ken_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-23T08:47:36Z-
dc.date.available2010-12-23T08:47:36Z-
dc.date.issued1990en_HK
dc.identifier.citationElt Journal, 1990, v. 44 n. 4, p. 279-285en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0951-0893en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/130175-
dc.description.abstractMany teachers find marking to be a tedious and unrewarding chore. While it is a crucial aspect of the classroom writing process, our diligent attention and careful comments only rarely seem to bring about improvements in subsequent work. To ensure that marking becomes an effective tool in our teaching programmes, then, we must persuade students to act on the feedback we provide. The alternative feedback methods suggested here offer explicit information about teacher expectations and encourage students to go back and reassess their work. 'Minimal marking' and taped commentary can therefore be considered as 'interactive' feedback styles. © 1990 Oxford University Press.en_HK
dc.languageengen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofELT Journalen_HK
dc.titleProviding productive feedbacken_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailHyland, K:khyland@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHyland, K=rp01133en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltexten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/elt/44.4.279en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0041590093en_HK
dc.identifier.volume44en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage279en_HK
dc.identifier.epage285en_HK
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike5413956-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats