File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Formative and summative assessment relationships: Synergies or constraints
Title | Formative and summative assessment relationships: Synergies or constraints |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Publisher | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) |
Citation | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) 12th Biennial Conference on "Developing Potentials for Learning", Budapest, Hungary, 28 August-1 September 2007 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The potential of formative assessment for enhancing student learning is now well-recognised but a
key challenge remains the influence of summative assessment. If formative assessment (also
known as assessment for learning) is to flourish, initiatives aimed at supporting a positive link
between formative and summative assessment functions are sorely needed. This paper explores
potential synergies between formative and summative assessment at a conceptual level and at the
level of practice. The main aims are as follows: To identify existing good practices at the interface
of formative and summative assessment and support the further development of these practices; To
examine under what circumstances summative assessment acts as a barrier to formative
assessment and under what circumstances it can be supportive. The paper is exploratory in nature
and draws on qualitative data from an ongoing project in Hong Kong primary schools. This
project, Primary English Assessment for Learning (PEAL), involves in-depth case studies, three of
which form the basis of this paper. The essence of the research method is to explore assessment for
learning practice through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations and documentary
analysis. The main findings to date relate to teachers’ conceptions of learning and assessment; the potential of ‘test paper review’ and ‘consolidation days’ to enhance learning after a test; and the
tensions stimulated by an external examination taken by year 3 and year 6 students. The
significance of the paper relates to its contribution to assessment theory in terms of the exploration
of synergies between formative and summative assessment. The paper also carries implications for
the development of a context-sensitive version of formative assessment. In other words, where
testing is frequent and pervasive negative impacts may be reduced if appropriate follow-up
learning interventions are carried out after a test is taken. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/109406 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Carless, DR | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-26T01:20:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-26T01:20:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) 12th Biennial Conference on "Developing Potentials for Learning", Budapest, Hungary, 28 August-1 September 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-963-482-836-5 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/109406 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The potential of formative assessment for enhancing student learning is now well-recognised but a key challenge remains the influence of summative assessment. If formative assessment (also known as assessment for learning) is to flourish, initiatives aimed at supporting a positive link between formative and summative assessment functions are sorely needed. This paper explores potential synergies between formative and summative assessment at a conceptual level and at the level of practice. The main aims are as follows: To identify existing good practices at the interface of formative and summative assessment and support the further development of these practices; To examine under what circumstances summative assessment acts as a barrier to formative assessment and under what circumstances it can be supportive. The paper is exploratory in nature and draws on qualitative data from an ongoing project in Hong Kong primary schools. This project, Primary English Assessment for Learning (PEAL), involves in-depth case studies, three of which form the basis of this paper. The essence of the research method is to explore assessment for learning practice through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations and documentary analysis. The main findings to date relate to teachers’ conceptions of learning and assessment; the potential of ‘test paper review’ and ‘consolidation days’ to enhance learning after a test; and the tensions stimulated by an external examination taken by year 3 and year 6 students. The significance of the paper relates to its contribution to assessment theory in terms of the exploration of synergies between formative and summative assessment. The paper also carries implications for the development of a context-sensitive version of formative assessment. In other words, where testing is frequent and pervasive negative impacts may be reduced if appropriate follow-up learning interventions are carried out after a test is taken. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Biennial Conference | en_HK |
dc.title | Formative and summative assessment relationships: Synergies or constraints | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Carless, DR: dcarless@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Carless, DR=rp00889 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 146930 | en_HK |