File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: How can we improve students’ literacy? A one-year longitudinal study on the use of a nontraditional approach to developing a Secondary 1 curriculum in Chinese language in Hong Kong
Title | How can we improve students’ literacy? A one-year longitudinal study on the use of a nontraditional approach to developing a Secondary 1 curriculum in Chinese language in Hong Kong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2007 |
Publisher | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) |
Citation | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) 12th Biennial Conference on "Developing Potentials for Learning", Budapest, Hungary, 28 August-1 September 2007 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Promoting students’ literacy—the ability to read and write has been one of the key foci in current
curriculum reforms in Hong Kong, as in elsewhere in the world. In this paper, we examine the
effectiveness of an innovative one-year curriculum on improving Secondary 1 students’ literacy in
Chinese language in Hong Kong. The design of such curriculum was guided by the Theory of
Variation and aimed to provide a more focused experience for students to develop their reading
comprehension and their capability to express themselves in writing. Unlike the predominant
practices which are text-based and focus on a great number of independent short passages or
simplified literature in the Chinese language curriculum, it is based on novels, including fictions
and non-fictions. Specifically, it focuses on helping students to differentiate the language
application and the uses of reading skills in a wider context of fiction versus non-fiction. Students’
sharing of their own opinions and interpretations of particular episodes in the novels was also
encouraged in the lessons and an on-line forum set up for their after-school discussions. The
results indicated that in the three participating schools, students who underwent the new
curriculum did not only score significantly higher in the language abilities test administered after
the curriculum implementation, than those who did not, but their gain score ‘. These findings
therefore support the conclusion that the reading of novels and contrasting various interpretations
among the students in the Chinese language curriculum is an effective, if not the most effective
way, in fostering students’ literacy. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/109388 |
ISBN |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tse, SK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Marton, FI | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Loh, EKY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chik, PM | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-26T01:20:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-26T01:20:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) 12th Biennial Conference on "Developing Potentials for Learning", Budapest, Hungary, 28 August-1 September 2007 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-963-482-836-5 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/109388 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Promoting students’ literacy—the ability to read and write has been one of the key foci in current curriculum reforms in Hong Kong, as in elsewhere in the world. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of an innovative one-year curriculum on improving Secondary 1 students’ literacy in Chinese language in Hong Kong. The design of such curriculum was guided by the Theory of Variation and aimed to provide a more focused experience for students to develop their reading comprehension and their capability to express themselves in writing. Unlike the predominant practices which are text-based and focus on a great number of independent short passages or simplified literature in the Chinese language curriculum, it is based on novels, including fictions and non-fictions. Specifically, it focuses on helping students to differentiate the language application and the uses of reading skills in a wider context of fiction versus non-fiction. Students’ sharing of their own opinions and interpretations of particular episodes in the novels was also encouraged in the lessons and an on-line forum set up for their after-school discussions. The results indicated that in the three participating schools, students who underwent the new curriculum did not only score significantly higher in the language abilities test administered after the curriculum implementation, than those who did not, but their gain score ‘. These findings therefore support the conclusion that the reading of novels and contrasting various interpretations among the students in the Chinese language curriculum is an effective, if not the most effective way, in fostering students’ literacy. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Biennial Conference | en_HK |
dc.title | How can we improve students’ literacy? A one-year longitudinal study on the use of a nontraditional approach to developing a Secondary 1 curriculum in Chinese language in Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Tse, SK: sktse@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Loh, EKY: ekyloh@HKUCC.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Tse, SK=rp00964 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 133586 | en_HK |