File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: How can we improve students’ literacy? A one-year longitudinal study on the use of a nontraditional approach to developing a Secondary 1 curriculum in Chinese language in Hong Kong

TitleHow can we improve students’ literacy? A one-year longitudinal study on the use of a nontraditional approach to developing a Secondary 1 curriculum in Chinese language in Hong Kong
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherEuropean Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI)
Citation
European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) 12th Biennial Conference on "Developing Potentials for Learning", Budapest, Hungary, 28 August-1 September 2007 How to Cite?
AbstractPromoting students’ literacy—the ability to read and write has been one of the key foci in current curriculum reforms in Hong Kong, as in elsewhere in the world. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of an innovative one-year curriculum on improving Secondary 1 students’ literacy in Chinese language in Hong Kong. The design of such curriculum was guided by the Theory of Variation and aimed to provide a more focused experience for students to develop their reading comprehension and their capability to express themselves in writing. Unlike the predominant practices which are text-based and focus on a great number of independent short passages or simplified literature in the Chinese language curriculum, it is based on novels, including fictions and non-fictions. Specifically, it focuses on helping students to differentiate the language application and the uses of reading skills in a wider context of fiction versus non-fiction. Students’ sharing of their own opinions and interpretations of particular episodes in the novels was also encouraged in the lessons and an on-line forum set up for their after-school discussions. The results indicated that in the three participating schools, students who underwent the new curriculum did not only score significantly higher in the language abilities test administered after the curriculum implementation, than those who did not, but their gain score ‘. These findings therefore support the conclusion that the reading of novels and contrasting various interpretations among the students in the Chinese language curriculum is an effective, if not the most effective way, in fostering students’ literacy.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/109388
ISBN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTse, SKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMarton, FIen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLoh, EKYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChik, PMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-26T01:20:14Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-26T01:20:14Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) 12th Biennial Conference on "Developing Potentials for Learning", Budapest, Hungary, 28 August-1 September 2007en_HK
dc.identifier.isbn978-963-482-836-5-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/109388-
dc.description.abstractPromoting students’ literacy—the ability to read and write has been one of the key foci in current curriculum reforms in Hong Kong, as in elsewhere in the world. In this paper, we examine the effectiveness of an innovative one-year curriculum on improving Secondary 1 students’ literacy in Chinese language in Hong Kong. The design of such curriculum was guided by the Theory of Variation and aimed to provide a more focused experience for students to develop their reading comprehension and their capability to express themselves in writing. Unlike the predominant practices which are text-based and focus on a great number of independent short passages or simplified literature in the Chinese language curriculum, it is based on novels, including fictions and non-fictions. Specifically, it focuses on helping students to differentiate the language application and the uses of reading skills in a wider context of fiction versus non-fiction. Students’ sharing of their own opinions and interpretations of particular episodes in the novels was also encouraged in the lessons and an on-line forum set up for their after-school discussions. The results indicated that in the three participating schools, students who underwent the new curriculum did not only score significantly higher in the language abilities test administered after the curriculum implementation, than those who did not, but their gain score ‘. These findings therefore support the conclusion that the reading of novels and contrasting various interpretations among the students in the Chinese language curriculum is an effective, if not the most effective way, in fostering students’ literacy.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherEuropean Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI)-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Association for Research on Learning and Instruction (EARLI) Biennial Conferenceen_HK
dc.titleHow can we improve students’ literacy? A one-year longitudinal study on the use of a nontraditional approach to developing a Secondary 1 curriculum in Chinese language in Hong Kongen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailTse, SK: sktse@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLoh, EKY: ekyloh@HKUCC.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityTse, SK=rp00964en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros133586en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats