File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/ejo/cjl019
- WOS: WOS:000236435900015
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Conference Paper: Does the mode of mandibular advancement affect the treatment effects on molar relationship?
Title | Does the mode of mandibular advancement affect the treatment effects on molar relationship? |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Citation | The 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In The European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e76-e77 Abstract no.161 How to Cite? |
Abstract | AIM: This prospective clinical study compared the molar relationship effect between mandibular
stepwise advancement and maximum jumping.
SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The headgear activator group (HGA-S) had stepwise advancement (n =
24, mean age = 11.9 ± 1.2 years) of 4 mm every 3 months with individualised bite opening following
the condylar translatory pathway, whilst the HGA-M group (n = 31, mean age = 11.2 ± 1.5 years) had
maximum jumping with edge-to-edge 6 mm interincisal opening. Active treatment was 12 months
(T0-T12) for the HGA-S group and 6 months (T0-T6) for the HGA-M group followed by 6 months
(T6-T12) of retention. Molar relationship effects were analysed from lateral cephalograms (Pancherz,
1982) taken at start of treatment (T0), 6 months (T6) and 12 months of treatment (T12). The results
were adjusted to similar observation lengths. Growth changes were obtained from the pre-treatment
HGA-M group.
RESULTS: The molar relationship was unchanged with 6 months’ growth. With the initial 6 months’
treatment (T0-T6) the molar relationship improved 2.8 mm (P < 0.001) and 3.2 mm (P < 0.001) with
HGA-M. With HGA-S, jaw base relationship improved 2.1 mm (P < 0.001) whereas the molars were
unaffected. With HGA-M, jaw-base relationship improved (1.5 mm; P < 0.01), maxillary molars
distalized (–1.1 mm; P < 0.01) and mandibular molars mesialized (0.6 mm; P < 0.01). During the
second 6 months (T6-T12) of active treatment, the molar relationship improved with HGA-S (1.9 mm;
P < 0.001) mainly due to an improved jaw base relationship (1.4 mm; P < 0.05). After HGA-M
retention, the molar relationship was unaffected, due to an insignificant jaw base relationship effect and relapse of the maxillary molars. During the total 12-month observation period, the effect on the
molar relationship was significantly larger (P < 0.05) with HGA-S than HGA-M.
CONCLUSION: With mandibular stepwise advancement there seem to be more skeletal and less
dental effects contributing to the improved molar relationship. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/94728 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.940 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hagg, EUO | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wey, MC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Bendeus, SAM | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-25T15:40:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-25T15:40:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | The 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In The European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e76-e77 Abstract no.161 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0141-5387 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/94728 | - |
dc.description.abstract | AIM: This prospective clinical study compared the molar relationship effect between mandibular stepwise advancement and maximum jumping. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: The headgear activator group (HGA-S) had stepwise advancement (n = 24, mean age = 11.9 ± 1.2 years) of 4 mm every 3 months with individualised bite opening following the condylar translatory pathway, whilst the HGA-M group (n = 31, mean age = 11.2 ± 1.5 years) had maximum jumping with edge-to-edge 6 mm interincisal opening. Active treatment was 12 months (T0-T12) for the HGA-S group and 6 months (T0-T6) for the HGA-M group followed by 6 months (T6-T12) of retention. Molar relationship effects were analysed from lateral cephalograms (Pancherz, 1982) taken at start of treatment (T0), 6 months (T6) and 12 months of treatment (T12). The results were adjusted to similar observation lengths. Growth changes were obtained from the pre-treatment HGA-M group. RESULTS: The molar relationship was unchanged with 6 months’ growth. With the initial 6 months’ treatment (T0-T6) the molar relationship improved 2.8 mm (P < 0.001) and 3.2 mm (P < 0.001) with HGA-M. With HGA-S, jaw base relationship improved 2.1 mm (P < 0.001) whereas the molars were unaffected. With HGA-M, jaw-base relationship improved (1.5 mm; P < 0.01), maxillary molars distalized (–1.1 mm; P < 0.01) and mandibular molars mesialized (0.6 mm; P < 0.01). During the second 6 months (T6-T12) of active treatment, the molar relationship improved with HGA-S (1.9 mm; P < 0.001) mainly due to an improved jaw base relationship (1.4 mm; P < 0.05). After HGA-M retention, the molar relationship was unaffected, due to an insignificant jaw base relationship effect and relapse of the maxillary molars. During the total 12-month observation period, the effect on the molar relationship was significantly larger (P < 0.05) with HGA-S than HGA-M. CONCLUSION: With mandibular stepwise advancement there seem to be more skeletal and less dental effects contributing to the improved molar relationship. | - |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | The European Journal of Orthodontics | en_HK |
dc.title | Does the mode of mandibular advancement affect the treatment effects on molar relationship? | en_HK |
dc.type | Conference_Paper | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Hagg, EUO: euohagg@hkusua.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Bendeus, SAM: sambende@hkusua.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Hagg, EUO=rp00020 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/ejo/cjl019 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 114436 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000236435900015 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0141-5387 | - |